2000
DOI: 10.2172/765406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HPGe Detector Efficiency Calibration Using HEU Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the geometry correction equation of Analytical Development Directorate SRNS-STI-2011-00224 Savannah River National Laboratory page 2 of 28 4/29/2011 reference 1, we calculate geometry correction values using the known detector and source dimensions combined with source to detector distances. We then compare measured detection efficiencies from a cylindrical shell of activity for the 185.7-keV photon (U-235) and for the 414.3-keV photon (Pu-239) with those determined for a 12-inch point source (2,7) to demonstrate agreement between experiment and the theoretically calculated values derived by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) authors of reference 1. We demonstrate this geometry correction first for the 185.7-and 414.3-keV -rays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Using the geometry correction equation of Analytical Development Directorate SRNS-STI-2011-00224 Savannah River National Laboratory page 2 of 28 4/29/2011 reference 1, we calculate geometry correction values using the known detector and source dimensions combined with source to detector distances. We then compare measured detection efficiencies from a cylindrical shell of activity for the 185.7-keV photon (U-235) and for the 414.3-keV photon (Pu-239) with those determined for a 12-inch point source (2,7) to demonstrate agreement between experiment and the theoretically calculated values derived by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) authors of reference 1. We demonstrate this geometry correction first for the 185.7-and 414.3-keV -rays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The content of each scrap can is measured by the traditional transmission-corrected assay using a combination of data as described above and using equations (1) and (3). Each assay is shown completely in a single line of the spreadsheet of Table 2.…”
Section: Transmission Correction Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The latter configuration required no assumptions regarding geometry. We attempted to adopt a similar approach for the uranium storage pigs.…”
Section: Deming Calibration and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a distance of r=25.5 inches, the effective length of view of the detector is 89.30 cm (3,6) , yielding a line source calibration constant of 0.00154±0.00009 g-sec/cm. From this constant the 235 U content in grams of each pig viewed in the approximate line source configuration described above is From the QC data acquired and from the Deming data acquired we have derived a transmission correction factor of 3.27±0.31 for an empty pig.…”
Section: Line Source Calibration and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%