HRM in Brazil: an institutional approach

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this work is to comparatively study human resources management (HRM) areas in Brazil, at the national level, analyzing how companies considered labor market and labor relations aspects when building their strategies and when configuring people management models in place in the country (2014–2019), based on local conditions.Design/methodology/approachThe subject was approached through qualitative analysis, encompassing document survey, systematic literature review, specialists' panel discussions, eight focus groups (43 human resources [HR] managers), interviews (16 union members), applying institutional approach to people management.FindingsIn regards to labor market and unions, HR areas faced different conditions across Brazilian regions. They have dealt with those influences on their strategic and quotidian decisions in an unstructured fashion. HR areas remain constructed as traditional, adjuvant and far from strategic level. In the institutionalization process – normative isomorphism – a professional HR jargon use was identified. HR areas usually act in collective bargaining, resorting to specialized professionals or consulting companies. During the economic crisis, HR professionals' attitude had a reactive nature, responding to organizations leadership, with little dedication to the emerging context.Practical implicationsThis work enables important players like HR managers, union members and specialists in public policies to interpret the institutionalization phenomena of practices related to management, labor market and labor relations in the country.Social implicationsUnderstanding the effects of the relations among state, companies and unions allows the different power vectors, acting upon the institutionalization process of people management areas in the Brazilian case, to be outlined.Originality/valueThis study applies the institutional approach to understand the economic and social heterogeneity affecting organizations in Brazil. It enhances the knowledge on HRM areas scope and their articulation toward labor market and relations.

Democracy, corruption and civil liberties: does national context influence corporate carbon disclosure?

“…This strand of literature is related to our paper, in the sense that institutional pillars can shape the behavior of companies in relation to carbon disclosure. Companies operating in different institutional environments may deal with different national characteristics and this can lead to more transparent disclosure (Acquah et al, 2021;Amorim et al, 2021;Pinheiro, Costa, et al, 2021;Soares et al, 2018). We believe that the Institutional Theory is the most appropriate to analyze the results, since it goes beyond the physical space of the organization and focuses on how organizations build their legitimacy while maintaining values and respecting the needs of society and national charac-teristics (Davis & North, 1970).…”

Digital shifts in human resource management in the global economy

“…However, it should be noted that both roles are transactional rather than strategic in nature. On the other hand, more (De Amorim et al, 2021) than half of the participants (55%) stated that HR personnel acts as a business partner in the enterprise. This assumes a more important role than that of an administrator.…”

The Intricate Systemic Relationships Between the Labor Market, Labor Relations, and Human Resources Management in a Pandemic Context

“…Other studies on people management adopting the same perspective are needed. A review by Araújo et al (2019) from 2005 to 2015 in Brazilian journals focused on administration identified only five articles on people management based on the institutional perspective, which is a scarcity that Lacombe and Chu (2008) and, more recently, Amorim et al (2021), have pointed out.…”