2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-0896-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HSA: integrating multi-track Hi-C data for genome-scale reconstruction of 3D chromatin structure

Abstract: Genome-wide 3C technologies (Hi-C) are being increasingly employed to study three-dimensional (3D) genome conformations. Existing computational approaches are unable to integrate accumulating data to facilitate studying 3D chromatin structure and function. We present HSA (http://ouyanglab.jax.org/hsa/), a flexible tool that jointly analyzes multiple contact maps to infer 3D chromatin structure at the genome scale. HSA globally searches the latent structure underlying different cleavage footprints. Its robustne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
105
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we also reconstructed the regular helix structure (having 100 points) used as benchmark dataset by Zou et al [16] and compared our models with the models reconstructed by two other state-of-the-art methods, HSA [16] and ShRec3D [12]. Using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (SRCC) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC), we find that our method’s performance is similar to HSA and ShRec3D at 90, 70 and 25 % signal coverages [see Additional file 1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, we also reconstructed the regular helix structure (having 100 points) used as benchmark dataset by Zou et al [16] and compared our models with the models reconstructed by two other state-of-the-art methods, HSA [16] and ShRec3D [12]. Using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (SRCC) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC), we find that our method’s performance is similar to HSA and ShRec3D at 90, 70 and 25 % signal coverages [see Additional file 1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ignored the HSA [16] method because of its slow speed, considering the fact that our chromosome structures have up to 479 points. The average Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between reconstructed models and input IF at 1 MB/500 KB reconstructed by Chromosome3D, PM2 and ShRec3D are −0.87/−0.85, −0.79/−0.78 and −0.65/−0.61 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consensus methods generate a single structure from ensemble Hi-C data 23,24 by relating contact frequencies with spatial distances, which are then used to generate a single 3D structure by optimizing a scoring function 3,2326 , a likelihood function through Bayesian inference 27 , or solving a generalized linear model 28 . These methods are conceptually simple and computationally time efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the approaches share the same strategy to convert the matrix of IFs into a matrix of preferred pairwise distances, and then use these distances in an optimization algorithm to build a chromosome structure. Variations of this approach are implemented in several programs, including TADbit (Baù et al 2011;Baù and Marti-Renom 2012), MOGEN Cheng 2014, 2016), MCMC5C (Rousseau et al 2011), AutoChrom3D (Peng et al 2013), BACH (Hu et al 2013), PASTIS (Varoquaux et al 2014), InfMod3DGen , and HSA (Zou et al 2016). Other approaches include ChromSDE , that used semidefinite programming, and ShRec3D (Lesne et al 2014), that used a graph theory to normalize the input heat map.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%