2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-017-2694-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Action Recognition Utilizing Variations in Skeleton Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the unit orthogonal vector generated in the linear subspace, which corresponds to the twodimensional hyperplane at the same time, and the definite feature frame in the video sequence is denoted as a i1 , a i2 ⋯ , a ir . The more inconsistent the recognition result is with the original action, the more dimensions are required [19].…”
Section: Action Segmentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the unit orthogonal vector generated in the linear subspace, which corresponds to the twodimensional hyperplane at the same time, and the definite feature frame in the video sequence is denoted as a i1 , a i2 ⋯ , a ir . The more inconsistent the recognition result is with the original action, the more dimensions are required [19].…”
Section: Action Segmentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the scene of criminal investigation is easy to destroy and due to other reasons, only one part of the identity feature is often collected. At this time, multimodal identification can provide more professional retrieval [24]. (2) Finance: as the financial field involves a lot of property privacy, it is particularly important to ensure identity authentication [25].…”
Section: Behavior Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An abundance of research has been done on human action recognition based on conventional machine learning techniques, such as K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classifiers [34,35], Support Vector Machine (SVM) [18,[35][36][37][38][39][40], Hidden Markov Models (HMM) [41,42], clustering strategies [42][43][44], and Bayesian learning [45,46]. Most of these techniques first extract hand-crafted features [34,36,38,39,46,47] and then apply a learning algorithm in order to classify the action. Wu et al,in [34], propose action descriptors with a sliding temporal window of size 5, which includes joint position, angular velocity, and angular acceleration.…”
Section: Conventional Learning-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is employed to reduce feature dimensionality, the k-means clustering algorithm is utilized to generate codewords, and Hidden Markov Models are deployed for action recognition on the basis of the codewords. Moussa et al [38] propose a methodology that depends on high-level features that carry information about changes in human body dimensions during the performance of the action. Their proposed system comprises four stages: the extraction of skeleton details, parameter calculation, parameter encoding, and, finally, a classification module, in which a multi-class linear SVM classifier is employed.…”
Section: Conventional Learning-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%