2022
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3130761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Activity Recognition Machine With an Anchor-Based Loss Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our benchmark regroups head-to-head 17 articles (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) by sharing their approach concerning the human activity recognition task evaluated on the UniMiB-SHAR dataset. Deep learning was the method of choice in almost every case (21-26, 28-32, 34, 35) to try to achieve state-of-the-art results.…”
Section: Related Work From Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our benchmark regroups head-to-head 17 articles (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) by sharing their approach concerning the human activity recognition task evaluated on the UniMiB-SHAR dataset. Deep learning was the method of choice in almost every case (21-26, 28-32, 34, 35) to try to achieve state-of-the-art results.…”
Section: Related Work From Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the results and metrics reported by one study cannot always be rigorously compared with all the others, as they must use the same evaluation methods. The evaluation methods featured in these articles are as follows: the evaluation of a validation set (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), the evaluation of a test set (27, 28), cross-validation (29)(30)(31)(32), and leave-one-subject-out (32,34,35).…”
Section: Related Work From Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [ 39 ] introduced using the distance-based loss function in MLP, CNN, LSTM and hybrid model, and found that CNN-D shows the best performance among these methods. Compared with CNN-D, the accuracy and F1-score increases by 1.21% and 0.89%.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fair comparison experiments, we implemented these two models without incremental learning and replaced the feature extractor for video with multi-channel signals. [27] designed a new framework for the open-set HAR with class anchor clustering (CAC) loss [28] instead of the softmax-based cross-entropy loss. CAC loss is a distance-based loss that combines an anchor loss and a tuplet loss.…”
Section: Related Work a Open-set Recognition For Harmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for open-set HAR, the existing open-set algorithms have been faced with the problem that features or probabilities of the unknown activities have little discernability, which is caused by the inter-activity similarity and the intra-activity diversity [18]- [20]. More precisely, some human activities are made up of the atomic behavioral characteristics of other activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%