1986
DOI: 10.1016/0272-0590(86)90112-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for the LVET there is no forced blink following application, as in the Draize test. The LVET has been shown to predict better the ocular response occurring in humans (3)(4)(5)(6). Reduction of animal use has been through the development of various in vitro screening tests used in tier eye irritation assessment processes to make preliminary decisions and establish the direction for further testing (1,8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for the LVET there is no forced blink following application, as in the Draize test. The LVET has been shown to predict better the ocular response occurring in humans (3)(4)(5)(6). Reduction of animal use has been through the development of various in vitro screening tests used in tier eye irritation assessment processes to make preliminary decisions and establish the direction for further testing (1,8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information regarding consumer use experience is important because animal tests, especially the Draize rabbit test, tend to ov-erpredict the human response (2,5,10). Information from repeated testing in animals, when available, provides better perspective than single test results because of the inherent variability of the test due to the subjective nature of the scoring system (2,8).…”
Section: Introduction Routine Animal Tests (Draize Test Low-volume Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LVET was used, in preference to the Draize test, because it is less stressful to rabbits and is more predictive of human ocular irritancy potential than the standard Draize procedure (9). Rats and rabbits were used because previous studies have suggested that the rat may be an appropriate alternative species to rabbits for studying mechanisms of eye irritation (24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%