2021
DOI: 10.15294/jils.v6i1.44450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Attitude and Technology: Analyzing a Legal Culture on Electronic Court System in Indonesia (Case of Religious Court)

Abstract: The use of technology for the judiciary is now a necessity. In Indonesia, information technology is used for court administration to achieve fast, simple, and low-cost trials. The Supreme Court issued a Supreme Court Regulation as the legal basis for the administration of administration and electronic trials. This is done to make it easier for people to seek justice. The electronic court began in 2018. Its implementation is carried out in stages, starting with certain religious courts as an introduction. Subse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sake of clarity, nothing in this section shall be presumed to restrict you from owning or operating a market that permits the general use and sale of cryptokitties, provided the market cryptographically verifies the right of each kitty owner to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the true owner can display such art, own or operate third party websites or applications that permit the inclusion, engagement, or participation of cryptokitties in general, provided that the third party websites or applications cryptographically verify each kitty owner's right to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the true owner can display the art, and provided that the art is no longer visible once the owner of the purchased kitty leaves the website/app, or earns revenue from one to come, even if that revenue exceeds $100,000 per year. 24 Own or operate third-party websites or apps that permit the inclusion, engagement, or participation of cryptokitties in general, provided that the third-party website or app cryptographically verifies the right of each kitty owner to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the real owner who can display the art, and provided that the art is no longer visible after the owner of the purchased kitty leaves the website/app, or earns revenue from the future, even if that income exceeds $100,000 annually. owns or operates the website or third party apps that permit the inclusion, engagement, or participation of cryptokitties in general, provided that the third party website or app cryptographically verifies each kitty owner's right to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the true owner can display the art, and provided that the art is no longer visible after the owner of the purchased kitty leaves the website/app.…”
Section: Intellectual Property Analysis On Cryptokitties Platforms (O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of clarity, nothing in this section shall be presumed to restrict you from owning or operating a market that permits the general use and sale of cryptokitties, provided the market cryptographically verifies the right of each kitty owner to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the true owner can display such art, own or operate third party websites or applications that permit the inclusion, engagement, or participation of cryptokitties in general, provided that the third party websites or applications cryptographically verify each kitty owner's right to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the true owner can display the art, and provided that the art is no longer visible once the owner of the purchased kitty leaves the website/app, or earns revenue from one to come, even if that revenue exceeds $100,000 per year. 24 Own or operate third-party websites or apps that permit the inclusion, engagement, or participation of cryptokitties in general, provided that the third-party website or app cryptographically verifies the right of each kitty owner to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the real owner who can display the art, and provided that the art is no longer visible after the owner of the purchased kitty leaves the website/app, or earns revenue from the future, even if that income exceeds $100,000 annually. owns or operates the website or third party apps that permit the inclusion, engagement, or participation of cryptokitties in general, provided that the third party website or app cryptographically verifies each kitty owner's right to display art for purchased kitty to ensure that only the true owner can display the art, and provided that the art is no longer visible after the owner of the purchased kitty leaves the website/app.…”
Section: Intellectual Property Analysis On Cryptokitties Platforms (O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this view has been challenged by the argument that if constitutional personality rights are granted to artificial intelligences, they should not be treated as property, and thus the property objection will be invalid. 31 On the other hand, although it seems to be against it, it can be said that the slave status proposal actually contains a secret acceptance of accepting artificial intelligence as a human being. 32 Another approach to the legal status of robotic artificial intelligences adopts the view of giving personality to artificial intelligences that can make autonomous decisions as long as they do not pose a threat to humanity.…”
Section: Legal Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 This can be seen in terms of managing the administrative registration of legal cases and the implementation of procedural law in every public court in Indonesia starting to use electronic systems. 6,7,8 The accumulation of many cases 9 at every level of the judiciary makes the government think of finding solutions to reduce the accumulation of cases a little by creating an innovation related to the system starting from the registration, case tracking, trial. The highest institution in the judiciary, namely the Supreme Court, precisely in 2018 issued and authorized an application system regarding electronic case registration and trial administration.…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%