2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human, Bovine and Porcine Systematic Vascular Input Impedances Are Not Equivalent: Implications for Device Testing and Xenotransplantation in Heart Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the increase in ΔP′ with asynchronous modulation was greater in the mock flow loop model (53 mm Hg) than the IHF bovine model (32 mm Hg), which may have been due to effects from anesthesia and/or a much higher aortic compliance (calf). 27 These pilot animal experiments demonstrate feasibility of asynchronous pump speed modulation with CF LVAD for generating vascular pulsatility and variation in ventricular volume, which warrant further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, the increase in ΔP′ with asynchronous modulation was greater in the mock flow loop model (53 mm Hg) than the IHF bovine model (32 mm Hg), which may have been due to effects from anesthesia and/or a much higher aortic compliance (calf). 27 These pilot animal experiments demonstrate feasibility of asynchronous pump speed modulation with CF LVAD for generating vascular pulsatility and variation in ventricular volume, which warrant further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…17 Similarly, animal models have significantly different aortic and arterial compliance values than humans. 18 These altered compliance values would lead to an inaccurate estimation of aortic pressure pulsatility. Further, in vitro mock circulation systems typically underestimate the reduction in left ventricular peak pressures due to pneumatic/hydraulic drivers, which may lead to inaccurate estimation of LVEW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, counterpulsation therapy is most effective when the displaced blood volume and ventricular stroke volume are comparable and aortic compliance is low (29). This study was performed in calves (80 kg) which have a substantially higher cardiac output (calf: 8-12 L/min vs. human: 4-6 L/min), stroke volume (calf: 100-120 mL, human: 35-50 mL), and greater arterial compliance than humans (30). As a result, the potential improvement in hemodynamics during CPD support in a human may actually be more pronounced than was observed in this study.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%