1990
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1990.312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human breast cancer: identification of populations with a high risk of early relapse in relation to both oestrogen receptor status and c-erbB-2 overexpression

Abstract: Summary We recently defined a new early prognostic factor, the ER+(R) status, which permits the discrimination of a group presenting a high risk of early relapse among the ER' patients. This group was referred to as ER+(R2) in contrast to ER+(R1) which corresponded to the group of ER' patients having a lower risk of early relapse. Taking into account the whole population including the ER-and inflammatory tumours, we have extended this view and showed that ER+(R) status is a significant predictor of disease-fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures are also in agreement with data reported in the literature [38,43,49]. Our data also show a strong inverse correlation between Her-2 and ER expression, which is in agreement with data reported by others [10,39,50,51]. Unlike reported data that shows a correlation between ER expression and tumor grade [41,43,47,49], however, we were unable to confirm such a correlation in our cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These figures are also in agreement with data reported in the literature [38,43,49]. Our data also show a strong inverse correlation between Her-2 and ER expression, which is in agreement with data reported by others [10,39,50,51]. Unlike reported data that shows a correlation between ER expression and tumor grade [41,43,47,49], however, we were unable to confirm such a correlation in our cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Consistent with previous reports that HER2− tumours tend to be ERα/PR+, 49–51 33 of the 45 tumours in this group were positive for these hormone receptors (Tables S1B and 2B). Our results show that the incidence of SHP2 overexpression in HER2−, but ERα/PR+ tumours was 79% (Table 2B), suggesting a positive relationship between SHP2 overexpression and nuclear accumulation of ERα/PR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of these studies have varied considerably but several studies have found consistent results with respect to certain prognostic factors. The original study reported by Slamon et al (1987) showed a positive association between c-erbB-2 expression and the number of involved axillary nodes, this finding has not been generally reproducible but finds some support in three other studies (Tandon et al, 1989;Guerin et al, 1989;May et al, 1990) and indirectly in the study by Zhou et al (1989) ship between c-erbB-2 expression and other markers of differentiation. Ploidy has previously been investigated by two groups neither of whom found any significant association (Tavassoli et al, 1989;Ro et al, 1989) At least 20 other groups have now published data concerning the prognostic significance of c-erbB-2, of these only four groups have failed to find a prognostic effect of c-erbB-2 in at least one sub group (Zhou et al, 1989;Ali et al, 1988;Gusterson et al, 1988;Barnes et al, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Wright et al (1989a) also found that the prognostic effect of c-erbB-2 expression was stronger in ER positive than ER negative tumours and also stronger in EGFR negative tumours than EGFR positive tumours. May et al (1989) (May et al, 1990) c-erbB-2 receptor expression is equivalent in node positive and in node negative patients and make the extremely important point that in order to reliably demonstrate the prognostic effect of c-erbB-2 expression in the node negative subset large numbers of patients are required. This is because c-erbB-2 is expressed relatively infrequently and because node negative patients have a much better prognosis than node positive patients and therefore relapse and die less frequently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%