Summary The relationship between the size of the primary tumour upon initial treatment and the incidence of distant metastasis during the course of the disease was investigated using data from 2648 breast cancers treated at the Institut Gustave Roussy between 1954 and 1972. This analysis suggests the existence for each tumour of a critical volume (threshold) at which the first remote metastasis is initiated. The correlation between the size of the primary tumour and the probability of metastatic dissemination was assessed as well as the influence on this correlation of two prognostic indicators: histological grade and number of involved lymph nodes. It was found that the threshold volume is strongly correlated with the number of involved lymph nodes and the histological grading.

In a study of 1,010 patients with solitary, unilateral, nonmetastatic breast cancer, the histologic grade, assessed by a multifactorial analysis (Cox model) to study its significance with other prognostic factors, was found to be an important, independent factor. For 612 operable patients, two laboratory characteristics, the number of histologically positive nodes and the histologic grade, were the most valuable predictors. These two factors alone form a predictive index that may be an excellent and simple guide for the clinical decision of subsequent therapy. For 398 patients with inoperable breast cancer (ie, tumor greater than or equal to 7 cm, N2-3, inflammatory, skin fixation, and clinically rapidly growing forms), the histologic grade (performed on drill or cutting needle biopsy) was again a most important (and with inflammatory forms the most important) predictor of prognosis in these patients. Our data support that performing our modified histoprognostic grading of Scarff and Bloom is simple, reproducible, incurs no additional cost, may be carried out in the simplest histology laboratory, and finally, defines an important risk factor in all patients. It should be routine for all breast cancer specimens. Furthermore, studies of adjuvant therapy should stratify patients for this variable.

The hallmarks of diagnosis of medullary breast cancer (MedBC) used by the authors since 1977 have been that the tumor is well circumscribed, has syncytial architecture in greater than 75% of its surface, contains diffuse inflammatory infiltrate, has atypical nuclei, and forms no glandular pattern. In order to assess the clinical utility of these criteria, we studied a series of 95 previously untreated, surgically operable patients with breast carcinoma at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR) between 1960 and 1979. A diagnosis of MedBC was initially made for these patients or suspected based on abundant inflammatory stroma observed in a histologic evaluation. Using these criteria, 26 cases were identified as typical medullary carcinoma (TMC), 23 cases as atypical medullary carcinoma (AMC), and 46 cases as nonmedullary carcinoma (NMC). The 26 cases of TMC represent a very small fraction of the total infiltrating operable breast carcinomas diagnosed at IGR during the same time period. The prognosis for these 26 patients was much more favorable than for the other groups. They had a 10-year disease-free survival of 92% compared with 53% for the AMC group and 51% for the NMC group. Neither distant metastasis nor secondary primaries of the same histology were seen. Therefore, it is possible with the use of strict histologic criteria to distinguish a group of patients with a much more favorable prognosis. This histologic diagnosis alone renders a most favorable prognosis for the patient even if other factors such as large tumor size and lymph node involvement are present and, by inference, the only therapy needed is the removal of all tumor. In contrast, atypical forms have a prognosis no different from other atypical types of breast carcinomas without inflammatory stroma, and adjuvant therapy appears to be justified if other factors warrant it.

No abstract

The clinical and pathological features of 33 previously untreated patients with primary breast sarcoma were retrospectively analysed to evaluate the prognostic significance of histologic variables on survival. The series comprised 17 cystosarcomas phyllodes and 16 stromal sarcomas (excluding angiosarcomas). All tumors were reviewed and classified in similar fashion to extramammary soft tissue sarcomas. In addition, immunohistochemical studies were performed on paraffin sections with a panel of several antibodies directed against cytoskeletal filaments and cellular enzymes; five cases were also examined by electron microscopy. Most tumors were malignant fibrous histiocytoma (21 cases) and fibrosarcoma (6 cases) types. Surgery was the main therapy. Metastasis-free survival rate was significantly correlated only with histological grade, consisting of tumor differentiation, tumor necrosis, and mitotic activity. Courses and survivals of the cystosarcoma and stromal groups were identical, questioning the clinical value of this pathologic distinction. All local recurrence, metastasis, or death occurred within 30 months, though follow-up was much longer. Immunohistochemistry was disappointing for identification of specific histologic sub-types.