OBJECTIVE -C-peptide replacement in animals results in amelioration of diabetes-induced functional and structural abnormalities in peripheral nerves. The present study was undertaken to examine whether C-peptide administration to patients with type 1 diabetes and peripheral neuropathy improves sensory nerve function.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-This was an exploratory, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled study with three study groups that was carried out at five centers in Sweden. C-peptide was given as a replacement dose (1.5 mg/day, divided into four subcutaneous doses) or a dose three times higher (4.5 mg/day) during 6 months. Neurological examination and neurophysiological measurements were performed before and after 6 months of treatment with C-peptide or placebo.RESULTS -The age of the 139 patients who completed the protocol was 44.2 Ϯ 0.6 (mean Ϯ SE) years and their duration of diabetes was 30.6 Ϯ 0.8 years. Clinical neurological impairment (NIA) (score Ͼ7 points) of the lower extremities was present in 86% of the patients at baseline. Sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) was 2.6 Ϯ 0.08 SD below body height-corrected normal values at baseline and improved similarly within the two C-peptide groups (P Ͻ 0.007). The number of patients responding with a SCV peak potential improvement Ͼ1.0 m/s was greater in C-peptide-treated patients than in those receiving placebo (P Ͻ 0.03). In the least severely affected patients (SCV Ͻ 2.5 SD below normal at baseline, n ϭ 70) SCV improved by 1.0 m/s (P Ͻ 0.014 vs. placebo). NIA score and vibration perception both improved within the C-peptide-treated groups (P Ͻ 0.011 and P Ͻ 0.002). A1C levels (7.6 Ϯ 0.1% at baseline) decreased slightly but similarly in C-peptide-and placebo-treated patients during the study.CONCLUSIONS -C-peptide treatment for 6 months improves sensory nerve function in early-stage type 1 diabetic neuropathy.
Diabetes Care 30:71-76, 2007C hronic hyperglycemia is a common feature of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes and an important factor for the development of microvascular complications. However, the functional and structural features of the complications for the two disorders show characteristic differences. Specifically, neuropathy in type 1 diabetes progresses more rapidly and shows a more marked decline of nerve conduction velocity than neuropathy in type 2 diabetes (1-4). The basis for the fall in conduction velocity are reduced endoneurial blood flow and diminished Na ϩ ,K ϩ -ATPase activity in the nerve (5-8), causing sodium ion accumulation, axonal swelling, and, subsequently, a disruption of the paranodal-axoglial junctions and the paranodal ion-channel barrier (9,10). This phenomenon, termed axoglial dysjunction, is a characteristic finding in type 1 diabetes but occurs rarely or not at all in type 2 diabetes (1). Moreover, the functional and morphometric abnormalities of nociceptive Cfibers are more severe in type 1 diabetes (11). These considerations suggest that other factors in addition to hyperglycemia contribute to the ...