1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(94)01152-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human capital and endogenous growth evidence from Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we calibrate a feasible range of values for using a range of values within the feasible parameter space for ↵ and . As observed by other studies the returns to physical capital, ↵, are higher for less developed countries (Tallman and Wang, 1994). In the empirical section this is discussed in more detail and the estimates using Sri Lankan data are presented.…”
Section: Derived Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Thus, we calibrate a feasible range of values for using a range of values within the feasible parameter space for ↵ and . As observed by other studies the returns to physical capital, ↵, are higher for less developed countries (Tallman and Wang, 1994). In the empirical section this is discussed in more detail and the estimates using Sri Lankan data are presented.…”
Section: Derived Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In Model 3, human capital is measured by the secondary school enrollment rate (Enroll) (Skidmore & Toya, 2002). In model 4, we treat human capital as a productivity enhancing factor instead of a factor of production (Tallman & Wang, 1994). In model 5, we control for potential endogeneity problem in the inefficiency function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 We follow the theoretical framework of production function in Borensztein, De Gregoio, and Lee (1998), in which human capital is considered as a factor of production. For the purpose of robustness check, we also estimate the model where human capital is assumed to be a laborenhancing factor (Tallman & Wang, 1994). Detailed estimated results are presented in Section 4.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is how to quantify the level of human capital. There are a few widely used measures: literacy rate [49], enrollment rate [50][51][52], average years of schooling [17,53,54], the number of individuals given level of education [55], educational facilities [56], labor income [57], and education expenditure [56,58,59]. Recent literature uses employment ratio to college graduates [60,61] and the share of working-age residents who completed university or college education [4].…”
Section: Model and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%