1998
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199800001-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-1β mRNA Expression Is Regulated by an Alternative Promoter

Abstract: The central step in endothelin biosynthesis is site-specific cleavage of big endothelins by endothelin-converting enzymes (ECEs). ECE-1 is a membrane-bound metalloprotease, predominantly but not exclusively expressed in endothelial cells. ECE-1 is expressed in two mRNA isoforms, termed alpha and beta, which differ only in the 5'-terminal regions but are functionally very similar when expressed in vitro. The structure of the human ECE-1 gene suggests either alternative splicing or alternative promoters as under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such differences in promoter function have recently been reported for the endothelin-converting enzyme-1 gene, in which the same promoter-reporter construct displayed different activities depending on the cell type studied. 21 Second, it is obvious that in our experimental context, the basal promoter activity was relatively low so that allelic differences might be more difficult to assess. Third, it is also possible that the functionality of the allelic promoter constructs would have been more specifically tested under different in vitro conditions because it might more appropriately correspond to the physiological or pathophysiological conditions in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such differences in promoter function have recently been reported for the endothelin-converting enzyme-1 gene, in which the same promoter-reporter construct displayed different activities depending on the cell type studied. 21 Second, it is obvious that in our experimental context, the basal promoter activity was relatively low so that allelic differences might be more difficult to assess. Third, it is also possible that the functionality of the allelic promoter constructs would have been more specifically tested under different in vitro conditions because it might more appropriately correspond to the physiological or pathophysiological conditions in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…But little is known regarding isoform‐specific ECE‐1 gene regulation in vivo and in vitro: Shao et al [16] showed different regulation of ECE‐1a, also termed ECE‐1β [11,17], and ECE‐1b (=1α) in a rat liver injury model and Corder et al studied the expression of ECE‐1a, 1b and 1c in stimulated bovine aortic endothelial cells [18]. In addition, we have recently demonstrated that ECE‐1a and ECE‐1b are regulated by alternative promoters and not by differential splicing and that members of the ETS family of transcription factors are involved in transcriptional regulation of ECE‐1a expression ([5,19,20]; submitted data). To gain further insight into isoform‐specific ECE‐1 gene expression we have cloned and analyzed the promoter of the major isoform, ECE‐1c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ten micrograms of the respective genomic DNAs were subjected to complete HinfI digestion. The literature documents further that significant functional differences were reported between HUVECs and ECV304 with regard to various aspects, e.g., expression of endothelial cell-specific enzyme mRNA, expression of endothelial cell-specific/-associated surface antigens such as CD31, CD62E and yon Wiilebrand factor, and effects of exposure to plasma albumin (Hughes, 1996;Fuentes et al, 1997;Funke-Kaiser et al, 1998). A detailed description of the methods used will be given elsewhere (Dirks et al, in preparation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%