1996
DOI: 10.1007/s001140050241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Evolution: the Study of Indian Mitochondrial DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent genetic studies (Quintana‐Murci et al 1999; Barnabas et al 2000; Kivisild et al 2003) support the existence and continuation of a proto‐Asian and proto‐European population in India. In an earlier study based on polymorphic sites, we found mtDNA separation between Dravidian and Indo‐European language speakers (Barnabas et al 1996a). In another study, higher frequencies of the mtDNA haplogroup ‘M’ were found in northeastern (68%) and midwestern tribal (61%) samples, whereas the frequency was only slightly higher in non‐tribal Dravidian language speakers (55%) compared to the Indo‐European language speakers (52%) (Barnabas et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent genetic studies (Quintana‐Murci et al 1999; Barnabas et al 2000; Kivisild et al 2003) support the existence and continuation of a proto‐Asian and proto‐European population in India. In an earlier study based on polymorphic sites, we found mtDNA separation between Dravidian and Indo‐European language speakers (Barnabas et al 1996a). In another study, higher frequencies of the mtDNA haplogroup ‘M’ were found in northeastern (68%) and midwestern tribal (61%) samples, whereas the frequency was only slightly higher in non‐tribal Dravidian language speakers (55%) compared to the Indo‐European language speakers (52%) (Barnabas et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The loss of the AvaII site at 4332, seen in KA88, is observed in West‐Eurasians (Torroni et al 1994a) whereas TA108 and ML103 (though a signature mutation for ‘U’ could not be tested) appear to be related to ‘U1’ and these are found in Dravidian language speakers. These two distinct branches hint at the separation of the two major Indian language groups (Barnabas et al 1996 a,b) as observed in Y‐chromosomal (Quintana‐Murci et al 2001; Mukherjee et al 2001) as well as autosomal studies (Sitalaxmi et al 2003), representing the more recent farming and pastoral migrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the possible cause of higher frequencies of CCR5-∆32 among Muslims and North Indians may be because of admixture as the Eurasians migrated through Europe [38]. Our results also suggest a sporadic presence of CCR5-∆32 mutations in some of the South Indian populations, which may be accredited to the presence of Eurasian Y chromosome haplotype groups in some of these populations [39,40]. Thus, the genetic admixture of Eurasians and Caucasians could possibly be one of the reasons for such distribution patterns and frequencies in India.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Ccr5-∆32 In Indiamentioning
confidence: 58%
“…from each language group). However, in a preliminary study (Barnabas et al 1996) of the data we noticed that the population belonging to the central state of Maharashtra showed distinguishably low diversity in comparison to populations from the north and the south. Since we have studied a statistically significant number of Central Indians, we decided to sample the data into three populations : North Indians, South Indians and Central Indians (from Maharashtra).…”
Section: Populationsmentioning
confidence: 75%