2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil–vegetable system: A multi-medium analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
341
5
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 776 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
15
341
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Where the chronic hazard index (HI) is the sum of more than one hazard quotient for multiple substances, CDI k is the daily intake of heavy metal (k) and RFD k is the chronic reference dose for the heavy metal k. HI values ˃ 1 shows that there is the chance that non-carcinogenic risk may occur and when HI ˂ 1 the reverse applies (Liu et al, 2013). Table 2.Shows the sample coding and data introduction of cosmetics products manufactured in Nigeria including manufacturing and expiry date, batch number and regulatory authorities (NAFDAC) number where available.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where the chronic hazard index (HI) is the sum of more than one hazard quotient for multiple substances, CDI k is the daily intake of heavy metal (k) and RFD k is the chronic reference dose for the heavy metal k. HI values ˃ 1 shows that there is the chance that non-carcinogenic risk may occur and when HI ˂ 1 the reverse applies (Liu et al, 2013). Table 2.Shows the sample coding and data introduction of cosmetics products manufactured in Nigeria including manufacturing and expiry date, batch number and regulatory authorities (NAFDAC) number where available.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that for cosmetic products manufactured in Nigeria, only arsenic in Royal Gold Cortex ® with calculated non carcinogenic risk value of 1.56E-08 constituted a non-cancer risk while arsenic in St. Ives Body Cream ® (non-cancer risk value =4.68E-07), Bioclaire Body Lightening Lotion ® (non-cancer risk value =1.17E-06) and mercury in Crusader Medicated Soap ® (non-cancer risk value =5.47E-09) constituted non-cancer risks for cosmetic products manufactured outside Nigeria. Only arsenic is carcinogenic among the two elements examined (Liu et al, 2013), although the US EPA has determined mercuric chloride and methyl mercury as possible human carcinogen (Das et al, 2011 (1) and 10 -6 -10 -4 respectively set by USEPA (Liu et al, 2013;US EPA 2001). These imply that the chance of non-cancer and cancer risk resulting from exposure to these metals at these concentrations is unlikely; however, heavy metals are cumulative in nature due to their long half lives and therefore build up of these elements on continuous usage of these cosmetic products could be detrimental.…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant positive correlations of Cr, Cd and Pb concentrations between vegetables and the corresponding soil were observed (R = 0.23** -0.26**, P < 0.01, n = 183), suggesting that the increase of metals in soil could influence their accumulation in vegetables (Figure 4). However, some other studies showed that heavy metals in vegetables had no significant relationship with soil metals (Liu et al, 2013). These different results may be caused by the difference of regional environment, soil properties, farming methods and pollution conditions.…”
Section: Bcfs Of Heavy Metals and As In Vegetablesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Use of phytoremediation alone can be time-consuming but it might be possible to enhance the remediation efficiency by intercropping with other remediation plant species (Llugany et al 2012;Ma et al 2012;Gupta et al 2013). Celery has been found to be a highly tolerant vegetable to some heavy metals such as Hg, Cd, Zn and Pb and its ability to remediate soil contaminated with both Cd and Zn has been observed and employed for several years in our laboratory Liu et al 2012;Liu et al 2013;Nai et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%