2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02219.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human immunodeficiency virus‐1 genotypic drug resistance among volunteer blood donors in Yunnan, China

Abstract: CRF_BC was the dominant subtype circulating in HIV-1-infected donors in Yunnan. Prevalence of genotypic drug resistances among donors in Yunnan was low in this study. Surveillance on HIV-1 infections among blood donors should be continued in China.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of HIV-1 DR (13.2%) was similar to those reported in studies performed in the United States (9.9%[42] and 10.9%[43]), European countries (14.2%)[44] and recent finding among Chinese former paid donors in Henan province (17.7%, 19/109)[41]; but higher than those from other Chinese HIV-1 treatment naïve populations in Yunnan province (2% to 4.3%)[10, 39, 45], Hangzhou (4%)[21], Jiangsu (2.1% to 4.1%)[35], Shaanxi (4.4%)[46] and Chengdu (1.3%)[18]; and also higher than those from other high risk populations such as: MSM (2%-5.3%)[23, 4749], IDU (3.8%-4.4%) in China. In Urumqi, the HIV-1 DR was 24.1% (7/29), which was different than the previous REDS-II study that found no sample harboring HIV-1 DR (0/14) in the same region during 2007 to 2010 [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence of HIV-1 DR (13.2%) was similar to those reported in studies performed in the United States (9.9%[42] and 10.9%[43]), European countries (14.2%)[44] and recent finding among Chinese former paid donors in Henan province (17.7%, 19/109)[41]; but higher than those from other Chinese HIV-1 treatment naïve populations in Yunnan province (2% to 4.3%)[10, 39, 45], Hangzhou (4%)[21], Jiangsu (2.1% to 4.1%)[35], Shaanxi (4.4%)[46] and Chengdu (1.3%)[18]; and also higher than those from other high risk populations such as: MSM (2%-5.3%)[23, 4749], IDU (3.8%-4.4%) in China. In Urumqi, the HIV-1 DR was 24.1% (7/29), which was different than the previous REDS-II study that found no sample harboring HIV-1 DR (0/14) in the same region during 2007 to 2010 [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The DRMs prevalence rate reported here (13.2%, 27/205) was lower than the published results from other studies about Chinese blood donors or anti-retroviral-naive populations that varied from 17% to 37.8%[10, 18, 39, 40]. Perhaps a result that some polymorphic accessory mutations such as: A71V/T and L10I/V on PIs; V106I and V90I on NNRTIs, commonly observed in previous studies[10, 41], were no longer classified as PI minor DRMs and NNRTI resistance mutations in the updated Stanford HIVdb Program Genotypic Resistance Interpretation Algorithm (HIVdb version 8.3).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A subsequent review of studies [44] from seven sub-Saharan African countries and three Asian countries reported that prevalence of transmitted HIVDR varied widely from 1.6% in Angola [45] to 18.4% in China [46], with higher prevalence of 10.7% and 11.5% reported in Togo [47] and Mali [48], respectively. The ability to compare published studies assessing transmitted drug resistant virus is limited by the use of different methodologies to estimate prevalence, including variations in sample size, mixing of population risk groups, long sampling time frames, and the inclusion of chronically infected individuals whose resistance may in fact be acquired.…”
Section: B Global Epidemiology Of Hiv Drug Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first HIV-1 epidemic that occurred among injecting drug users (IDUs) in 1989 in China was reported inYunnan. [3][4][5] Multiple HIV-1 genotypes, including B, C, CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC, and CRF08_BC, are all currently involved in the HIV-1 epidemiology in the area, 6 which suggested the possible emergence of a new recombination because more than two subtypes of HIV-1 strains may circulate in a high-risk population. In this study, we characterized a novel recombinant involving subtypes B and C, which is different from the B=C recombinant previously reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%