2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of low-risk women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of point estimates for HPV-18 appeared to overlap for results from younger (range 0.1-0.5 infections/ 100 woman-months) and older populations (0.0-0.1 infections/100 woman-months). Among four studies presenting age-stratified incidence, 9,13,22,37 rates generally decreased with increasing category of older age (Figure 2). Furthermore, plots of cumulative incidence estimates against study follow-up time (Supplementary Appendix 2), showed a similar age-related pattern of incidence, with younger populations having higher HPV incidence than older participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The range of point estimates for HPV-18 appeared to overlap for results from younger (range 0.1-0.5 infections/ 100 woman-months) and older populations (0.0-0.1 infections/100 woman-months). Among four studies presenting age-stratified incidence, 9,13,22,37 rates generally decreased with increasing category of older age (Figure 2). Furthermore, plots of cumulative incidence estimates against study follow-up time (Supplementary Appendix 2), showed a similar age-related pattern of incidence, with younger populations having higher HPV incidence than older participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,2227,3742 b Studies included are limited to those that have HPV incidence results among populations or sub-populations where ≤15% of women have abnormal cervical status at baseline and where ≤5% of women are HIV-positive. c The median age of the study population was used when the mean age was not reported. 12,22,23,25,37,38 Age was defined as the midpoint of the median age in years for reference. 61 d The L1 primer type was not specified in article. e The median length of follow-up was used when the mean length was not reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current prevalence of different stages was estimated by using published data [5,9,10]. We attached QoL weights to each health state ( Table 1).…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%