This study examines the relationship of respiratory system resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) measured by forced oscillometry with transpulmonary resistance (RL) measured by oesophageal manometry.Simultaneous forced oscillometry using a single frequency of 5 Hz and oesophageal manometry were performed on five asthmatics during bronchoprovocation. The data obtained were used to derive prediction equations for RL from oscillometric parameters, which were tested on a further six asthmatics and 35 nonasthmatic subjects.In the first five asthmatic subjects, RL correlated more strongly with Xrs than with Rrs. In the second set of asthmatics, RL ranged 0.0005-4.57 kPa?s?L with the values measured in this set of patients. Xrs in subjects with other respiratory conditions appeared to follow the same relationship with RL as in asthmatics. Lumped element modelling suggested that the linear relationship between Xrs and RL was a consequence of the increasing contribution of central and upper airway wall shunts as peripheral airway resistance rose, and that this effect was much larger than that due to changes in static elastance.In conclusion, the reactance of the respiratory system can predict transpulmonary resistance more accurately than can the resistance of the respiratory system.
KEYWORDS: Airway hyperresponsiveness, airway obstruction, forced oscillation technique, resistanceA s a pulmonary function test for measuring resistance, the forced oscillation technique (FOT) has several advantages [1]. It is a passive manoeuvre, requiring only tidal breathing from the subject, and can provide continuous measurement of the resistance of the respiratory system (Rrs), delineating within-breath changes with sub-second resolution. It also has limitations. First, as distal airways obstruction increases, there is worsening agreement of Rrs with transpulmonary resistance (RL) measured by oesophageal manometry [2]. Under these conditions, Rrs is underestimated because the upper airway wall, which acts as an impedance in parallel (or shunt) with the lower airway, becomes increasingly important. Secondly, it is less useful for diagnosis as any pathology produces a similar pattern of abnormality in oscillometric results, although differing in degree [1]. Despite these drawbacks, the FOT performs similarly to standard tests in many areas (e.g. bronchodilator reversibility [3] and bronchial challenge testing [4]). In order to guarantee its wider use, it needs to surpass current techniques or be useful in areas less well furnished with tests.The agreement between Rrs and RL can be improved by the use of a head plethysmograph [5], but this approach is cumbersome. A further recent proposal was the use of changes in admittance (the reciprocal of impedance) during bronchoprovocation [6]. Theoretically, this quantity should be independent of the effect of upper airway wall shunt, and the results obtained from standard oscillometric equipment compared with the head plethysmograph, although not identical, supported this claim. However,...