2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human–robot collaboration systems in agricultural tasks: A review and roadmap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, other agricultural technologies are being developed and implemented to improve crop productivity (yield per area) and the sustainability of the agricultural activity, and indeed, they will affect the soil and plant responses and the agronomic recommendations for gypsum management. Such improved technologies include (i) smart fertilizers (e.g., slow and controlled release fertilizers, bioformulated fertilizers, nanofertilizers, beneficial nutrients) developed to enhance nutrient use efficiency and crop yield with low impacts on the natural environment (Raimondi et al, 2021;Karthik and Maheswari, 2021;Tayade et al, 2022;Verma et al, 2022;Abiola et al, 2023;Areche et al, 2023;Chakraborty et al, 2023); genetic engineering and genome editing techniques of crop plants to improve their resistance to stresses and use-efficiency of agricultural amendments (Jan and Shrivastava, 2017;Mackelprang and Lemaux, 2020;Clouse and Wagner, 2021;Lebedev et al, 2021;Raza et al, 2022); large-scale application of artificial lights (light supplementation) to field crops (Lemes et al, 2021), and digitalization-integration-robotization plus AI (artificial intelligence), DL (deep learning) and blockchain of agriculture (Krithika, 2022;Srivastava, et al, 2022;Adamides and Edan, 2023;Ali et al, 2023;Mahibha and Balasubramanian, 2023;Cheng et al, 2023;Mesías-Ruiz et al, 2023;Okolie et al, 2023;Wakchaure et al, 2023;Zeng et al, 2023) are emerging and represent some of the most recent advances for modern sustainable and productive agriculture.…”
Section: Gypsum Knowledge Gaps and Futures Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, other agricultural technologies are being developed and implemented to improve crop productivity (yield per area) and the sustainability of the agricultural activity, and indeed, they will affect the soil and plant responses and the agronomic recommendations for gypsum management. Such improved technologies include (i) smart fertilizers (e.g., slow and controlled release fertilizers, bioformulated fertilizers, nanofertilizers, beneficial nutrients) developed to enhance nutrient use efficiency and crop yield with low impacts on the natural environment (Raimondi et al, 2021;Karthik and Maheswari, 2021;Tayade et al, 2022;Verma et al, 2022;Abiola et al, 2023;Areche et al, 2023;Chakraborty et al, 2023); genetic engineering and genome editing techniques of crop plants to improve their resistance to stresses and use-efficiency of agricultural amendments (Jan and Shrivastava, 2017;Mackelprang and Lemaux, 2020;Clouse and Wagner, 2021;Lebedev et al, 2021;Raza et al, 2022); large-scale application of artificial lights (light supplementation) to field crops (Lemes et al, 2021), and digitalization-integration-robotization plus AI (artificial intelligence), DL (deep learning) and blockchain of agriculture (Krithika, 2022;Srivastava, et al, 2022;Adamides and Edan, 2023;Ali et al, 2023;Mahibha and Balasubramanian, 2023;Cheng et al, 2023;Mesías-Ruiz et al, 2023;Okolie et al, 2023;Wakchaure et al, 2023;Zeng et al, 2023) are emerging and represent some of the most recent advances for modern sustainable and productive agriculture.…”
Section: Gypsum Knowledge Gaps and Futures Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, other agricultural technologies are being developed and implemented to improve crop productivity (yield per area) and the sustainability of the agricultural activity, and indeed, they will affect the soil and plant responses and the agronomic recommendations for gypsum management. Such improved technologies include (i) smart fertilizers (e.g., slow and controlled release fertilizers, bioformulated fertilizers, nanofertilizers, beneficial nutrients) developed to enhance nutrient use efficiency and crop yield with low impacts on the natural environment (Raimondi et al, 2021;Karthik and Maheswari, 2021;Tayade et al, 2022;Verma et al, 2022;Abiola et al, 2023;Areche et al, 2023;Chakraborty et al, 2023); genetic engineering and genome editing techniques of crop plants to improve their resistance to stresses and use-efficiency of agricultural amendments (Jan and Shrivastava, 2017;Mackelprang and Lemaux, 2020;Clouse and Wagner, 2021;Lebedev et al, 2021;Raza et al, 2022); large-scale application of artificial lights (light supplementation) to field crops (Lemes et al, 2021), and digitalization-integration-robotization plus AI (artificial intelligence), DL (deep learning) and blockchain of agriculture (Krithika, 2022;Srivastava, et al, 2022;Adamides and Edan, 2023;Ali et al, 2023;Mahibha and Balasubramanian, 2023;Cheng et al, 2023;Mesías-Ruiz et al, 2023;Okolie et al, 2023;Wakchaure et al, 2023;Zeng et al, 2023) are emerging and represent some of the most recent advances for modern sustainable and productive agriculture.…”
Section: Gypsum Knowledge Gaps and Futures Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the problem of uncertainty in the control and recognition of industrial robots must be addressed. Therefore, in cluttered circumstances where it is difficult to achieve complete automation and in the case of challenging automation tasks that require high operability and a wide range of work areas, there is an increasing interest in human-robot interaction (HRI) or human-robot collaboration (HRC) technology [1], [2], where humans actively intervene as supervisors for the robot's tasks [3], [4], [5], [6]. Moreover, in the face of these challenges, motion recognition technology plays a crucial role in enhancing the control and recognition of industrial robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%