2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human vs. high-frequency traders, penny jumping, and tick size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcomes reported align with outcomes from prior studies conducted by Frino, Mollica, and Zhang (2015) and Mahmoodzadeh and Gençay (2017), as well as Hagströmer and Nordén (2013). These studies collectively support the assertion that smaller tick prices indeed have an impact on the escalation of High-Frequency Trading (HFT) activity.…”
Section: Tick Price and Hftsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The outcomes reported align with outcomes from prior studies conducted by Frino, Mollica, and Zhang (2015) and Mahmoodzadeh and Gençay (2017), as well as Hagströmer and Nordén (2013). These studies collectively support the assertion that smaller tick prices indeed have an impact on the escalation of High-Frequency Trading (HFT) activity.…”
Section: Tick Price and Hftsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Once a human trader places an order at a round number with last digit zero, on the ask side, algorithmic “queue jumping is done by submitting an order with last digit 9 and the buy side by an order with last digit 1… Automated traders queue-jump first the manual trader quote then leap frog each other as they compete for top of the book” [ 79 ]. Algorithms advanced into the more detailed aspect of reality where humans did not [ 85 ]. Summing up, a study group of 14 central banks comes to the conclusion that “while algorithms can relatively easily handle the extra digit, human traders find it more difficult to adapt” [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…authentic traders use round numbers as cognitive reference points (Rosch, 1975) to simplify and save effort in the decision-making and evaluation (Ikenberry and Weston, 2008;Kuo et al, 2015;Lacetera, Pope, and Sydnor, 2012), distinguishing authentic trades from algorithmic trades (Mahmoodzadeh and Gençay, 2017;O'Hara, Yao, and Ye, 2014). Wash traders typically use automated trading programs, particularly when fake orders feature small transaction size yet substantial aggregate amounts (Vigna and Osipovich, 2018;Rodgers, 2019).…”
Section: Trade Size Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%