Human Weaknesses and strengths in collaboration with robots

Ogorodnikova, Olesya

doi:10.3311/pp.me.2008-1.05

Cited by 28 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Constant values (0,3 and 1,2m) indicate the optimal distances of interaction for the corresponding levels based on the psychological and ergonomic evaluations [26]. These characteristics are rather relative and can be obtained for each robot/task individually.…”

Section: Fig 7 Safety Modes Transition Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

An integrated monitoring system for the human robot collaborative workspace

Ogorodnikova

2009

2009 3rd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Safety is a major concern in many complex robotized systems especially when the task implies collaboration between human and robot with the workspace sharing. In this research a theoretical representation of the integrated safety monitoring system is introduced. The monitoring system is modeled as a separated unit which decision making mechanism is based on the safety expert system (SES) data analysis and the danger index approach, and which operation relies on the safety related algorithms associated with four human-robot interaction levels. A new scale of the injury severity and likelihood for a HRI domain is proposed and the concept is integrated into the safety modes control algorithm. The case study analysis is modeled by means of the united modeling (UML) and the Visual C# Edition software(s).

show abstract

Section: Fig 7 Safety Modes Transition Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

An integrated monitoring system for the human robot collaborative workspace

Ogorodnikova

2009

2009 3rd International Workshop on Soft Computing Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this way, physical interactions between humans and robots are increasingly desirable and essential. Such interactions must take place under safe and operator-friendly conditions (Ogorodnikova 2008).…”

Section: Hazardous Human-robot Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Degraded situation awareness in a robotic workspace: accident report analysis

Camblor

Salotti

Fage

et al. 2021

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We adopted an approach based on interactions in a robotic workspace, coupled with Endsley's model of Situation Awareness (SA), to identify factors that potentially degrade operators' SA: the eight SA demons (Endsley and Jones 2016). We propose here to study the implications of these demons in 45 industrial accidents involving robotic. These demons were associated with possible interactions a human may have in a robotic workspace. Our results showed that five of the eight SA demons (Endsley and Jones 2016) appeared in the accident reports examined. The results showed that the identified SA demons were mainly associated with the first level of SA (perception level). We have also been able to describe five patterns of SA demon occurence in these accidents. SA demons are generally involved in human-robot interactions rather than human-environment interactions. Thanks to this analysis, we found that an operator's SA is mainly impacted by the Errant Mental Model and Out-of-the-Loop SA demons in human-robot and human-environment interactions. Finally, we propose recommendations regarding workspace design.

show abstract

“…Thus, they often need to be combined with subjective metrics such as selfreports or questionnaires [24]. Yet, studies demonstrated that a combination of different physiological metrics could be tied to achieve more accurate prediction results for human workload [26,27].…”

Section: Human Data Collection To Complement the Dtmentioning

confidence: 99%