1912
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.19014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humanism, philosophical essays

Abstract: HUMANISM ations of the word would still connect with Humanism a Renascence of Philosophy ? And shall we not accept this reminiscence as an omen for the future ? For it is clear, assuredly, that Philosophy has still to be born again to enter on her kingdom, and that her votaries must still be born again to purge their systems of the taint of an inveterate barbarism.But some of these suggestions verge, perhaps, upon the fanciful : it suffices to have shown that Humanism makes a good name for the views I seek to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those defining Durkheim's sociology more exclusively in rationalist / structuralist terms also seem likely to distance themselves from Durkheim's Moral Education (1902-1903, The Evolution of Educational Thought (1904Thought ( -1905, and The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). However, when examined mindfully of his 1913-1914 lectures, Durkheim's Moral Education, The Evolution of Educational Thought, and Elementary Forms of the Religious Life suggest that Durkheim not only had begun to question the viability of structuralist analysis prior to developing his lectures on pragmatism, but that he also had been doing so in more explicit, fundamental, and consequential terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those defining Durkheim's sociology more exclusively in rationalist / structuralist terms also seem likely to distance themselves from Durkheim's Moral Education (1902-1903, The Evolution of Educational Thought (1904Thought ( -1905, and The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). However, when examined mindfully of his 1913-1914 lectures, Durkheim's Moral Education, The Evolution of Educational Thought, and Elementary Forms of the Religious Life suggest that Durkheim not only had begun to question the viability of structuralist analysis prior to developing his lectures on pragmatism, but that he also had been doing so in more explicit, fundamental, and consequential terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2 Still, it may well be Durkheim's reading of the lesser-known British pragmatist F.C.S. Schiller's (1903Schiller's ( , 1907 texts that provided him with some of the clearest conceptual material on pragmatist thought. Nevertheless, Durkheim very much centers his 1913-1914 lectures on notions of pragmatism that he assigns to William James.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These early perspectives laid the foundation for later theories of play. Figures like Froebel (1887), Pestalozzi (1894), Dewey (1910), andMontessori (1914) emphasized the educational value of play, while Schiller (1875), andSpencer (1873), and Groos (1898) explored its purpose.…”
Section: Theories Of Playmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of beauty with other socially favorable attributes by Dion et al (1972), illustrated the survival and reinforcement of old stereotypes according to which “beauty is inseparable from goodness” (Sappho (630–570 BC), Fragment 101, as translated by T.H. Wharton (1887)) and “physical beauty is the sign of an inner spiritual and moral beauty” (Schiller 1875).…”
Section: A Short Trip Back In Time and The Roots Of Modern Cosmetologymentioning
confidence: 99%