Humanitarian need drives multilateral disaster aid

Abstract

As the climate changes, human livelihoods will increasingly be threatened by extreme weather events. To provide adequate disaster relief, states extensively rely on multilateral institutions, in particular the United Nations (UN). However, the determinants of this multilateral disaster aid channeled through the UN are poorly understood. To fill this gap, we examine the determinants of UN disaster aid using a dataset on UN aid covering almost 2,000 climate-related disasters occurring between 2006 and 2017. We make two principal contributions. First, we add to research on disaster impacts by linking existing disaster data from the Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT) to a meteorological reanalysis. We generate a uniquely global hazard severity measure that is comparable across different climate-related disaster types, and assess and bolster measurement validity of EM-DAT climate-related disasters. Second, by combining these data with social data on aid and its correlates, we contribute to the literature on aid disbursements. We show that UN disaster aid is primarily shaped by humanitarian considerations, rather than by strategic donor interests. These results are supported by a series of regression and out-of-sample prediction analyses and appear consistent with the view that multilateral institutions are able to shield aid allocation decisions from particular state interests to ensure that aid is motivated by need.

Help your neighbor, help yourself: The drivers of European Union's climate cooperation in trans‐governmental networks with its neighbors

“…For example, Betzold and Weiler (2017) analyze data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development on bilateral climate change adaptation aid, and show that countries that are more exposed to climate change risks, such as extreme weather events or sea‐level rise, receive more financial assistance. Similar conclusions are reached in a study of the UN's climate‐related disaster aid allocation (Dellmuth et al, 2021).…”

Why Climate? The Drivers of the European Union’s Climate Governance in its Post-Soviet East European Neighbors

“…The argument is that EU foreign policy is driven by interests, such as in geopolitics, energy security, border security, regional stability, or addressing dependencies (e.g., Bosse 2012;Lavenex 2015;Young 2014). Meanwhile, opponents of this point of view suggest that it is third countries' vulnerabilities and needs that define the EU's response (e.g., Dellmuth et al 2021;Shyrokykh 2018b). Other works describe EU foreign policy as the promotion of an ideal vision of itself, arguing that EU foreign policy is, in essence, an unreflexive promotion of internal rules to the outside world (e.g., Bicchi 2006;Zielonka 2013).…”

Estimating eviction prevalence across the United States

“…Fourth, the methodological strategy of reconciling primary (court issued) and secondary (proprietary) data presented here provides a means of producing population-level estimates when collecting complete administrative records or representative survey data are costly or unfeasible. It can be adapted to produce innovative, comparable, and more accurate measurement strategies to investigate long-standing questions about drivers of the reproduction of poverty and inequality ( 31 , 32 ).…”