Humans-as-a-Sensor for Buildings—Intensive Longitudinal Indoor Comfort Models

Abstract

Evaluating and optimising human comfort within the built environment is challenging due to the large number of physiological, psychological and environmental variables that affect occupant comfort preference. Human perception could be helpful to capture these disparate phenomena and interpreting their impact; the challenge is collecting spatially and temporally diverse subjective feedback in a scalable way. This paper presents a methodology to collect intensive longitudinal subjective feedback of comfort-based preference using micro ecological momentary assessments on a smartwatch platform. An experiment with 30 occupants over two weeks produced 4378 field-based surveys for thermal, noise, and acoustic preference. The occupants and the spaces in which they left feedback were then clustered according to these preference tendencies. These groups were used to create different feature sets with combinations of environmental and physiological variables, for use in a multi-class classification task. These classification models were trained on a feature set that was developed from time-series attributes, environmental and near-body sensors, heart rate, and the historical preferences of both the individual and the comfort group assigned. The most accurate model had multi-class classification F1 micro scores of 64%, 80% and 86% for thermal, light, and noise preference, respectively. The discussion outlines how these models can enhance comfort preference prediction when supplementing data from installed sensors. The approach presented prompts reflection on how the building analysis community evaluates, controls, and designs indoor environments through balancing the measurement of variables with occupant preferences in an intensive longitudinal way.

The Impact of Design Interventions on Occupant Satisfaction: A Workplace Pre-and Post-Occupancy Evaluation Analysis

“…Therefore, how IEQ categories translate into occupant satisfaction remains a challenging question [32,33]. Thus, researchers continue to use subjective votes/ratings of occupants to better understand objective measurements of IEQ categories [13,34].…”

Measuring Criterion Validity of Microinteraction Ecological Momentary Assessment (Micro-EMA): Exploratory Pilot Study With Physical Activity Measurement

“…Thus, there is preliminary evidence that μEMA may enable gathering high-frequency self-report with manageable burden, a complementary approach to EMA. Recently, μEMA has been used to gather data on stress [14], hyperarousal [15], and perceived comfort [16], and it has also been used with small pervasive displays [17].…”

Developing an Approach to Colour Assessment of Works of Art on Aim to Creating a Comfortable and Harmonious Interior

“…Modern technologies offer different approaches to creating comfortable living conditions and maintaining a good level of mental health within a living space. For example, theoretical methodologies based on the guidelines for arranging polychrome works of art , which are in general determined by the interior's style as well as the interior's atmosphere [1,17]; ecological and ergonomic aspects of environmental design [18,19]; the essential links between the environment, its functional purpose and physiological comfort, labour efficiency as well as supporting and creating mental harmony [4,8,20]; developing progressive and functionally useful mobile gadgets designed to improve human comfort [21,22]. Currently there is the WELL certification standard, which is one of the first leading tools for advancing health and well-being in buildings globally [23].…”