Humans, machines and decisions: Clinical reasoning in the age of artificial intelligence, evidence‐based medicine and Covid‐19

Loughlin, Michael; Copeland, Samantha

doi:10.1111/jep.13572

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 36 publications

(88 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent editions have focussed on the ongoing discussions concerning shared decision making, person‐centred care, patient expertise and value‐based practice, 8 , 9 with authors building on earlier debates regarding the integration of health and social care 10 to advance new approaches to the clinical encounter and the developing interactions between technical and humanistic features of care. 11 …”

Section: Philosophy and The Clinic: Stigma Respect And Shamementioning

confidence: 99%

“…[5][6][7] Recent editions have focussed on the ongoing discussions concerning shared decision making, person-centred care, patient expertise and value-based practice, 8,9 with authors building on earlier debates regarding the integration of health and social care 10 to advance new approaches to the clinical encounter and the developing interactions between technical and humanistic features of care. 11 These important themes are developed further in this edition, which includes a special section on stigma, shame and respect. This section includes papers aimed at identifying, understanding and addressing discrimination in clinical settings [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and on respect and shame in healthcare and bioethics.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Philosophy and the clinic: Stigma, respect and shame

Loughlin

Dolezal

Hutchinson

et al. 2022

Evaluation Clinical Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since its foundation in 2010, the annual philosophy thematic edition of this journal has been a forum for authors from a wide range of disciplines and backgrounds, enabling contributors to raise questions of an urgent and fundamental nature regarding the most pressing problems facing the delivery and organization of healthcare. Authors have successfully exposed and challenged underlying assumptions that framed professional and policy discourse in diverse areas, generating productive and insightful dialogue regarding the relationship between evidence, value, clinical research and practice. These lively debates continue in this thematic edition, which includes a special section on stigma, shame and respect in healthcare. Authors address the problems with identifying and overcoming stigma in the clinic, interactional, structural and phenomenological accounts of stigma and the ‘stigma‐shame nexus’. Papers examine the lived experience of discreditation, discrimination and degradation in a range of contexts, from the labour room to mental healthcare and the treatment of ‘deviancy’ and ‘looked‐after children’. Authors raise challenging questions about the development of our uses of language in the context of care, and the relationship between stigma, disrespect and important analyses of power asymmetry and epistemic injustice. The relationship between respect, autonomy and personhood is explored with reference to contributions from an important conference series, which includes analyses of shame in the context of medically unexplained illness, humour, humiliation and obstetric violence.

show abstract

Section: Philosophy and The Clinic: Stigma Respect And Shamementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Philosophy and the clinic: Stigma, respect and shame

Loughlin

Dolezal

Hutchinson

et al. 2022

Evaluation Clinical Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ethics of using copyrighted materials, such as books, and the use of this artificial intelligence in writing copy for business, school essays and publications, such as newspaper and research works, warrant urgent attention. Time will tell whether artificial intelligence will be used for clinical decision‐making instead of dietitians 18 . The best artificial intelligence chatbot may recognise human emotions but cannot develop its own emotions that are so important when we counsel patients.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Time will tell whether artificial intelligence will be used for clinical decision-making instead of dietitians. 18 The best artificial intelligence chatbot may recognise human emotions but cannot develop its own emotions that are so important when we counsel patients. As with all technologies, dietitians will need to explore the benefits, beware the detriments, and develop ethics around responsible uses in their future practice.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital dietetics and the era of artificial intelligence

Allman‐Farinelli

2023

Nutrition & Dietetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As recent special editions of this journal make very clear, the idea that we need to focus on the 'whole person', if we are to understand and better promote human health, has very much regained currency in contemporary healthcare debates. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] This 'whole-person' approach, dating back to the ancients, 9 requires not only understanding a person's biology, but also seeing that person as a social being whose needs, well-being and flourishing are essentially relational in nature. To live a human life is to be engaged with one's 'environment' in the broadest sense of this term, concerning one's interactions with other people, animals, the natural objects and the human constructions that constitute one's world.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%