Hunters and Their Perceptions of Public Access: A View from Afield

Abstract

Declining hunter participation threatens cultural traditions and public support for conservation, warranting examination of the forces behind the downward trajectory. Access to lands for hunting, an often-cited reason for nonparticipation, may play a critical role in the retention and recruitment of hunters. Meeting the access needs of a diverse hunting constituency requires understanding how hunters use and perceive access opportunities, particularly public-access sites. Given that perceptions of access are entirely place based and degrade with time, traditional postseason survey methods may fail to adequately quantify the value of public access to the hunting constituency. To overcome the potential limitations of postseason surveys, we conducted on-site assessments of hunter perceptions of habitat quality, game abundance, ease of access, and crowding as well as whether the experience met the hunters' expectations and their likelihood to return to hunt. Over 3 y, we interviewed 3,248 parties of which 71.5% were hunting. Most parties (65.9%) reported having no private access within the region of Nebraska where they were interviewed. Parties (67.6%) were largely limited to two or fewer hunters, most of whom were adult males (84.3%) who were, on average, 41.2 y old. The perception of public-access sites was generally positive, but 43.1% of parties indicated that game abundance was below average despite 59.2% of parties seeing game and 37.3% harvesting at least one animal. Similar to other explorations of hunter satisfaction, we found game abundance, and in particular harvest success, had the most consistent relationship with hunter perception of public access. By surveying multiple types of hunters across sites that encompass a range of social and ecological conditions, we gained a broader understanding of how hunters perceive public access in real time, which will help to inform future management decisions to foster and improve public-access programs.

Constraints to hunting and harvesting elk in a landscape dominated by private land

“…It is concerning that Nebraska elk hunters view the lack of access to game as the greatest constraint to harvest, as harvest opportunity has routinely been cited as one of the most important determinants of hunter satisfaction (Hammitt et al 1990, Gigliotti 2000, Frey et al 2003, Schroeder et al 2018, Gruntorad et al in press). By increasing public or private land availability, management agencies may provide more areas to hunt and indirectly decrease conflicts among hunters (potentially increasing harvest success) (Fontaine et al 2019, Wszola et al in press).…”

Disentangling Individual Phases in the Hunted vs. Farmed Meat Supply Chain: Exploring Hunters’ Perceptions in Italy

“…Burger et al [ 52 ] and Burger and Sanchez [ 53 ] explored hunters’ risk perceptions and environmental concerns to evaluate options and prepare plans for future uses of contaminated lands. Other authors evaluated hunters’ level of satisfaction and perceptions towards the hunting experience in public-access land [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ] or private land [ 59 ]. Focusing on African communities, LeBreton et al [ 60 ] and Friant et al [ 61 ] investigated hunters’ perception of disease risk connected to bush meat contact and HWGM consumption.…”

The influence of the COVID‐19 pandemic on spring turkey hunting

“…Although the reduction in alternative activities may have allowed for more time for hunters to participate, it did not necessarily translate into more time spent hunting. Access and harvest success are also widely thought to limit hunter participation (Schroeder et al 2018, Fontaine et al 2019.…”