2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HuntMi: an efficient and taxon-specific approach in pre-miRNA identification

Abstract: BackgroundMachine learning techniques are known to be a powerful way of distinguishing microRNA hairpins from pseudo hairpins and have been applied in a number of recognised miRNA search tools. However, many current methods based on machine learning suffer from some drawbacks, including not addressing the class imbalance problem properly. It may lead to overlearning the majority class and/or incorrect assessment of classification performance. Moreover, those tools are effective for a narrow range of species, u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the three tree-based methods included, MiPred (Jiang et al, 2007) and HuntMi (Gudyś et al, 2013) are based on random forests and CID-miRNA (Tyagi et al, 2008) on decision trees. The hairpin classifier used by CID-miRNA is using a stochastic contextfree grammar and is implemented with J48 (Quinlan, 1993).…”
Section: Hairpin Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the three tree-based methods included, MiPred (Jiang et al, 2007) and HuntMi (Gudyś et al, 2013) are based on random forests and CID-miRNA (Tyagi et al, 2008) on decision trees. The hairpin classifier used by CID-miRNA is using a stochastic contextfree grammar and is implemented with J48 (Quinlan, 1993).…”
Section: Hairpin Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of early machine learning classifiers for miRNA discovery are Triplet-SVM (Xue et al, 2005) and mir-abela (Sewer et al, 2005), which are based on Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Subsequently, miRNA prediction algorithms relying on many different classifiers have been published, including Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) (Terai et al, 2007;Agarwal et al, 2010), random forests (Jiang et al, 2007;Gudyś et al, 2013), artificial neural networks (Rahman et al, 2012) and decision trees (Tyagi et al, 2008). The emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies led to development of prediction methods using read mapping in genomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to examine class imbalance effect, the largest available negative dataset for human was used (http://adaa.polsl.pl/agudys/huntmi/huntmi.htm) [15]. Of this dataset about 50000 sequences were used for testing.…”
Section: A Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods include microPred (Batuwita and Palade 2009), MiRenSVM (Ding et al 2010), mirExplorer (Guan et al 2011), HeteroMirPred (Lertampaiporn et al 2013), and HuntMi (Gudys et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, we failed to validate HuntMi (Gudys et al 2013), which has recently appeared as an efficient tool, implementing ROC-select and applied random forest to get the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. Twenty gigabytes of memory on our machine was not enough to build its models on our data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%