2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Artificial Intelligence System for the Design of Highly-Automated Production Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) assembly systems of divergent (nonsequential) structures (ii) station design: a. multiple robots per station (for handling and joining) b. geometry stations and respot stations (iii) product variants (iv) joining process design: a. different joining technologies b. fixture-and stationary-based joining (v) handling process design: a. station loading b. part collection c. unloading It has been shown that none of the here presented scenarios equal the RASD problem tackled in this paper. Hence, in previous studies of (Hagemann und Stark 2018), (Hagemann et al 2019) existing methods of ruled-based systems, artificial intelligence (AI) and mathematical optimization have been analyzed and evaluated. The evaluation has revealed that discrete mathematical optimization techniques, as already applied for numerous SALB, RALB and RALD problems, suit the RASD problem best due to the generation of optimal solutions.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(i) assembly systems of divergent (nonsequential) structures (ii) station design: a. multiple robots per station (for handling and joining) b. geometry stations and respot stations (iii) product variants (iv) joining process design: a. different joining technologies b. fixture-and stationary-based joining (v) handling process design: a. station loading b. part collection c. unloading It has been shown that none of the here presented scenarios equal the RASD problem tackled in this paper. Hence, in previous studies of (Hagemann und Stark 2018), (Hagemann et al 2019) existing methods of ruled-based systems, artificial intelligence (AI) and mathematical optimization have been analyzed and evaluated. The evaluation has revealed that discrete mathematical optimization techniques, as already applied for numerous SALB, RALB and RALD problems, suit the RASD problem best due to the generation of optimal solutions.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimality and the lack of transparency of AI systems or even the feasibility of their results cannot be ensured. (Hagemann et al 2019) (Damaševičius 2008) Hence, in this paper, an algorithm, which covers all of the above-listed requirements (i-v), is introduced. A discrete optimization formalization will be applied which automatically generates solutions for robotic assembly systems, specialized on the automotive body-in-white production stages.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different to what is found in the literature for systems that manage and improve the performance of production lines, the self-learning capabilities that could be provided by the AI techniques have not been fully deployed in systems for decisiontaking among different processes. In this sense, currently, the common use widely seen is the so-called hybrid intelligence learning use: the DSS is capable to produce a ranking or a statement on costs or other attributes [30]. However, the final decision-taking on the process and the follow-up and accumulation of new experiences still rely heavily on human operators.…”
Section: Formal Models and Trends Of Dss Applied To Manufacturing Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simon Hagemann [7] presented a novel AI methodology capable of generating initial production configurations base. He concluded that to ensure high efficiency in the automotive industry AI techniques are vital.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%