2021
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abf00c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid asynchronous brain–computer interface for yes/no communication in patients with disorders of consciousness

Abstract: Objective. For patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC), such as vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), communication is challenging. Currently, the communication methods of DOC patients are limited to behavioral responses. However, patients with DOC cannot provide sufficient behavioral responses due to motor impairments and limited attention. In this study, we proposed a hybrid asynchronous brain–computer interface (BCI) system that provides a new communication channel for patients w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five of the 11 patients enrolled (2 VS/UWS, 2 MCS, 1 EMCS; 45.5%) reached a significant classification accuracy both in a task of number recognition and number comparison and 3 out of 5 patients (1 VS/UWS, 1 MCS, 1 EMCS) reached a significant classification accuracy also in a mental calculation task. Finally, Huang et al ( 2021b ) implemented a hybrid asynchronous BCI as a communication channel and 3 MCS patients out of 7 DoC patients tested (42.9%) gained accuracies higher than the chance level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of the 11 patients enrolled (2 VS/UWS, 2 MCS, 1 EMCS; 45.5%) reached a significant classification accuracy both in a task of number recognition and number comparison and 3 out of 5 patients (1 VS/UWS, 1 MCS, 1 EMCS) reached a significant classification accuracy also in a mental calculation task. Finally, Huang et al ( 2021b ) implemented a hybrid asynchronous BCI as a communication channel and 3 MCS patients out of 7 DoC patients tested (42.9%) gained accuracies higher than the chance level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent research, these patients could be diagnosed with MCS star with covert consciousness (diagnosed as UWS based on CRS-R assessment but with minimal preservation of brain metabolism) ( Thibaut et al, 2021 ) or cognitive motor dissociation (CMD, patients show no detectable command-following behaviors, but there is clear evidence of command-following brain activity) ( Egbebike et al, 2022 ). One research study found that three out of seven DOC patients could communicate using the asynchronous brain-computer interface (BCI), suggesting that BCI can be a helpful tool for bedside communication with DOC patients ( Huang et al, 2021 ). In addition, another study found that 83.33% of patients with CMD diagnosed with BCI were able to regain consciousness, indicating that clinicians can recognize the awareness of BCI-based clinical diagnosis in DOC patients ( Pan et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several representative works on BCI-based awareness detection in patients with DoC are shown in Table 1 . 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] As the vision of most patients with DoC is commonly limited, researchers naturally considered using an auditory paradigm to detect awareness. Lulé et al first used an auditory P300 paradigm to detect awareness in patients with DoC.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%