2011
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exr045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Hybrid) automata and (stochastic) programs * The hybrid automata lattice of a stochastic program

Abstract: We define a semantics for stochastic Concurrent Constraint Programming (sCCP), a stochastic process algebra, in terms of stochastic hybrid automata with piecewise deterministic continuous dynamics. To each program we associate a lattice of hybrid models, parameterized with respect to the degree of discreteness left. We study some properties of this lattice, presenting also an alternative semantics in which the degree of discreteness can be dynamically changed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These may arise e.g. as approximations to CTMCs where some of the populations have large numbers (which can be well approximated as continuous variables) while others have sufficiently small numbers to require a discrete treatment [14,12,32]. The models so obtained are known as stochastic hybrid systems (SHS) [16], and their dynamics can be seen as a sequence of discrete jumps, instantaneously modifying population variables, interleaved by periods of continuous evolution along a trajectory of the SDE.…”
Section: Stochastic Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may arise e.g. as approximations to CTMCs where some of the populations have large numbers (which can be well approximated as continuous variables) while others have sufficiently small numbers to require a discrete treatment [14,12,32]. The models so obtained are known as stochastic hybrid systems (SHS) [16], and their dynamics can be seen as a sequence of discrete jumps, instantaneously modifying population variables, interleaved by periods of continuous evolution along a trajectory of the SDE.…”
Section: Stochastic Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If all transitions of a sCCP program are stochastic and have constant increment updates, they can be interpreted as flows, and a fluid semantics can be defined [21]. However, to properly deal with random resets and instantaneous transitions, it is more convenient to consider a more general semantics for sCCP, in terms of stochastic hybrid automata [17,18,19]. This approach will also allow us to partition variables and transitions into discrete and continuous, so that only a portion of the state space will be approximated as fluid.…”
Section: Stochastic Concurrent Constraint Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will assume to work with flat sCCP models, so that we can ignore the structure of agents and focus our attention on system variables. In this respect, this approach differs from the one of [18], but it provides a more homogeneous treatment.…”
Section: From Sccp To Tdshamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviour of a stochastic HYPE model is determined by mapping the model to a mathematical formalism, namely a transition-driven stochastic hybrid automaton (TDSHA) [13,14]. In choosing a mapping for Bio-PEPA to a stochastic hybrid formalism, the choice is between a language-based formalism such as stochastic HYPE and a mathematical formalism such as TDSHA.…”
Section: Stochastic Hypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is then used to describe the continuous behaviour of the model, while the structure of the multitransition system describes the discrete behaviour, both instantaneous and stochastic. For reasons of space, details of TDSHA are omitted from this article and the reader is referred to [13,14].…”
Section: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%