A calculation mistake has been found in this Full Paper. In the calculation process of the apparent quantum efficiency (QE), a coefficient in the denominator should be 3600, but it was mistakenly used as 360. For this reason, the correction QE of the 0.5G-ZCS and 0.5G-ZCS-N samples in the work should be 1.98 and 0.87 %, but not 19.8 and 8.7 %, respectively. Page 1176 (Abstract): "and the apparent quantum efficiency was 19.8 % at 420 nm", 19.8 % should be changed to 1.98 %. Page 1182: "The apparent quantum efficiency (QE) of the 0.5G-ZCS sample was 19.8 % at 420 nm", 19.8 % should be changed to 1.98 %. Page 1182: "the photoactivity of 0.5G-ZCS-N (QE = 8.7 %) is lower than that of 0.5G-ZCS (QE = 19.8 %)", two values should be changed to 0.87 and 1.98 %, respectively. Page 1183: "The corresponding QE is 19.8 % at 420 nm" and "The photocatalytic H 2-production rate and QE at 420 nm of the 0.5G-ZCS-N sample were only 0.30 mmol h À1 g À1 and 8.7 %, respectively", two values should also be changed to 1.98 and 0.87 %, respectively. This change does not affect any of the results, analysis, or conclusions presented in the rest of the article. Authors apologize for any inconvenience derived from their mistake.