2007
DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.2007013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Gridded Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed top down iterations of tomographic velocity updating on the velocity model in order to derive a final depth interval velocity model for PSDM (Jones et al, 2007). The velocity model building was broken down into 10 model building units (MBUs).…”
Section: Model Building For Psdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We performed top down iterations of tomographic velocity updating on the velocity model in order to derive a final depth interval velocity model for PSDM (Jones et al, 2007). The velocity model building was broken down into 10 model building units (MBUs).…”
Section: Model Building For Psdmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives correct ray paths at the seafloor, but suffers from the inaccuracies in 1D velocity picking involved in the creation of the field, and the result breaks down below the seafloor. Iterative depth domain tomographic velocity updating followed by PSDM is the best solution to the problem (Jones et al, 2007). This not only gives an accurate ray traced seafloor reflection, but also allows the deeper velocities to be determined based on ray traced analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical model described in this paper is based on the discrete layer velocity model representation and can be easily coupled with a layer -based tomographic inversion scheme. The challenge will be to incorporate an analogous model to gridded or hybrid velocity model representations [Jones et al, 2007] for complex geological structures, where the velocity regime is controlled by a combination of vertical compaction gradients and sharp velocity contrasts. 10-20-100-125 at seabed (sb), 10-20-100-125 at sb + 0.3 s, 8-15-100,120 at sb + 0.6 s, 5-10-90-110 at sb + 0.9 s, 3-8-50-70 at sb + 2.5 s Frequency -distance (f-x) deconvolution for random noise attenuation Amplitude-phase Inverse Q compensation = 200 Cosmetic sea noise mute preSDM/preSTM images with and without prestack amplitude shaping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a more fl exible route is to adopt a hybrid approach in which we combine the benefi ts of both schemes: the ability of a gridded route to capture the subtle lateral velocity variation inherent to some strata while keeping the sharp vertical breaks occasionally present in the earth (such as at chalk and salt boundaries (Jones et al, 2007). However, a more fl exible route is to adopt a hybrid approach in which we combine the benefi ts of both schemes: the ability of a gridded route to capture the subtle lateral velocity variation inherent to some strata while keeping the sharp vertical breaks occasionally present in the earth (such as at chalk and salt boundaries (Jones et al, 2007).…”
Section: Hybrid Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%