1996
DOI: 10.5636/jgg.48.749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Modeling of the Formation of Thin Current Sheets in Magnetotail Configurations

Abstract: Hybrid simulations are used to investigate the formation of a thin current sheet inside the plasma sheet of a magnetotail-like configuration. The initial equilibrium is subjected to a driving electric field qualitatively similar to what would be expected from solar wind driving. As a result, we find the formation of a new current sheet, with a thickness of approximately the ion inertial length. The current density inside the current sheet region is supplied largely by the electrons. Ion acceleration in the cro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
54
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for an event observed by the Geotail satellite at X = -17 Re, Mukai et al [1998] reported that the tail current was intensified stepwise at the end of the growth phase, and electrons carded this intensified current. The results of hybrid simulations [e.g., Pritchett and Coroniti, 1995;Hesse et al, 1996] have suggested that the current density in a thin tail current sheet is attributed mostly to electrons, and the contribution from ions actually tends to decrease as a current sheet becomes thinner. The difference in the results might be explained in terms of the magnetic configuration.…”
Section: Mitchell Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for an event observed by the Geotail satellite at X = -17 Re, Mukai et al [1998] reported that the tail current was intensified stepwise at the end of the growth phase, and electrons carded this intensified current. The results of hybrid simulations [e.g., Pritchett and Coroniti, 1995;Hesse et al, 1996] have suggested that the current density in a thin tail current sheet is attributed mostly to electrons, and the contribution from ions actually tends to decrease as a current sheet becomes thinner. The difference in the results might be explained in terms of the magnetic configuration.…”
Section: Mitchell Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several interesting magnetotail models based on a Vlasov or hybrid description of plasma have been developed [Hesse et al, 1996;Pritchett et al, 1996;Biichner et al, 1998]. These models realistically describe the system's particle dynamics and the plasma instability; their internal evolution is almost perfect for studies of local processes like reconnection but is significantly less valuable when applied to a global magnetotail configuration.…”
Section: 808 Peroomian Et Al: Self-consistent Magnetotail Configumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding electron channel would be even thinner than the ion channel, and for consistency we get the so-called thin current sheet, characterized by /k = A = Pio [Cowley, 1971[Cowley, , 1973Ashour-Abdalla et al, 1994]. However, recent studies of the distant tail magnetic structure clearly indicate that in general the current sheet is relatively thick [Hoshino et al, 1996a], the thin current sheet being more appropriate for the growth phase of substorm events [e.g., Hesse et al, 1996]. In particular, the average current sheet thickness has been estimated from the observations to be of the order of -• 2.5Rz [Pulkkinen et al, 1993[Pulkkinen et al, , 1996, while the ion thermal Larmor radius pio is only • 200 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%