2007
DOI: 10.2529/piers060908081435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Numerical Simulation of Electrostatic Force Microscopes Considering Charge Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the elements definitions and the solving of the system of equations are programmed in Matlab. In former studies the electrostatic and mechanical equations were considered to be weak coupled, which means that the mechanical and electrostatical forces are calculated separately (Helmich, 2007;Bala, 2008;Greiff, 2009). In this case convergence of the solution is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the elements definitions and the solving of the system of equations are programmed in Matlab. In former studies the electrostatic and mechanical equations were considered to be weak coupled, which means that the mechanical and electrostatical forces are calculated separately (Helmich, 2007;Bala, 2008;Greiff, 2009). In this case convergence of the solution is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the region Ω 2 linear FEM: Equation 4 is applied. Since, the approximation of equation (3) will be kept only near the tip and the approximation of equation (4) will be applied to the total region, the global approximation function for both ansatz functions becomes: Equation 5 where A ( ρ ) is applied to reduce the influence of equation (3) away from the tip which is shown in Figure 4 and defined by: Equation 6 Now applying equation (5) into equation (2) leads to a set of linear differential equations which can be represented in matrix form as: Equation 7 where M is the matrix resulting from the augmented FEM and F is the stiffness matrix expressed by: Equation 8 On the FEM‐BEM transmission interface (Bala et al , 2007) Γ T =Γ 3 ∩Γ 2 , u 2 = u 3 and: Equation 9 Using the Gauss theorem on the augmented finite element and finite element domain one obtains (Reddy, 1993): Equation 10 i.e. for all: Equation 11 Equation 12 where u 12 includes u 1 and u 2 .…”
Section: Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%