ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Point Cloud Semantic Compression for Automotive Sensors: A Performance Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, 2D compression and, in particular, PNG and J-LS, outperforms the Octree-based compression. In fact, unlike their 2D counterparts, Octree methods tend to overfit the data and cannot detect and appropriately remove redundant information hidden in the point cloud representations [9], resulting in a dramatic drop in the compression rate when increasing the resolution. On the contrary, PNG still guarantees a promising 80% compression rate, up to 25% better than Octree.…”
Section: B Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, 2D compression and, in particular, PNG and J-LS, outperforms the Octree-based compression. In fact, unlike their 2D counterparts, Octree methods tend to overfit the data and cannot detect and appropriately remove redundant information hidden in the point cloud representations [9], resulting in a dramatic drop in the compression rate when increasing the resolution. On the contrary, PNG still guarantees a promising 80% compression rate, up to 25% better than Octree.…”
Section: B Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 (below) illustrates that image-based methods are still faster than the 3D ones. Notably, decompression takes less time than compression, a critical feature for autonomous driving since decompression is generally executed on-board of cars [9].…”
Section: B Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work we consider the sensor data from the Kitti multimodal dataset, collected using a Volkswagen Passat equipped with a Velodyne LiDAR [8]. In particular, we rely on the data compression pipeline proposed in [28]. First, we infer semantic segmentation of point clouds with RangeNet++ [20].…”
Section: Application Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The Quality of Experience (QoE): The transmitted data should be accurate enough to perform driving operations. For our case study, the Quality of Experience (QoE) depends on the symmetric point-to-point Chamfer Distance CD sym , which is inversely proportional to the quality of the received data [28]. To incorporate both these factors, the agent reward is designed to balance between QoS and QoE via a tuning parameter 𝛼 ∈ [0, 1].…”
Section: Ai Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%