2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12115687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Quality Inspection for the Automotive Industry: Replacing the Paper-Based Conformity List through Semi-Supervised Object Detection and Simulated Data

Abstract: The still prevalent use of paper conformity lists in the automotive industry has a serious negative impact on the performance of quality control inspectors. We propose instead a hybrid quality inspection system, where we combine automated detection with human feedback, to increase worker performance by reducing mental and physical fatigue, and the adaptability and responsiveness of the assembly line to change. The system integrates the hierarchical automatic detection of the non-conforming vehicle parts and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Object Detection Accuracy Hybrid Quality Inspection [72] 82% ResNet-101-FPN [73] 71.8% Deep Learning framework [74] 96% Proposed Framework 98%…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object Detection Accuracy Hybrid Quality Inspection [72] 82% ResNet-101-FPN [73] 71.8% Deep Learning framework [74] 96% Proposed Framework 98%…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assembly Line Integrating inline inspection and testing necessary in the case of EVs into the existing IC engine-based conventional assembly line is a significant barrier [13], [16]. It can require careful planning and coordination; and proposed the use of a hybrid inspection system that combines both human and automated inspection to improve the quality of the assembly process [19].…”
Section: Integrate Inline Inspection and Testing Necessary In Case Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies reported mixed and similar results [83,91] or a lower model performance compared with human inspectors [92]. This variety of results indicates a gap in fully automated inspection and a prevalence of human intervention, including cases where algorithms initiate the inspection and inspectors intervene for dubious items or items below a predefined threshold [93,94]. In all cases, DL models assist inspection activities by reducing human intervention, thus reducing physical and mental fatigue.…”
Section: Inspection Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%