Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Mechatronics, Electronic, Industrial and Control Engineering 2014
DOI: 10.2991/meic-14.2014.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid self-organizing migrating algorithm based on estimation of distribution

Abstract: A new hybrid self-organizing migrating algorithm based on estimation of distribution (HSOMA) is proposed to resolve the defect of premature convergence in the self-organizing migrating algorithm (SOMA) and improve the search ability of SOMA. In order to make full use of the statistical information on population and increase the diversity of migration behavior, HSOMA introduces the thought of estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) into SOMA and reproduces the genes of new individuals by both SOMA and EDA. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also introduced adaptive control parameters for each migration loop, the performance has been demonstrated through the CEC'13 and CEC'17 benchmark test suites. In addition, other variants of SOMA have also confirmed its superior performance compared to the original version such as SOMGA [10], C-SOMGA [9], CSOMA [28], SOMAQI [30], M-SOMAQI [29], mNM-SOMA [1], and HSOMA [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It also introduced adaptive control parameters for each migration loop, the performance has been demonstrated through the CEC'13 and CEC'17 benchmark test suites. In addition, other variants of SOMA have also confirmed its superior performance compared to the original version such as SOMGA [10], C-SOMGA [9], CSOMA [28], SOMAQI [30], M-SOMAQI [29], mNM-SOMA [1], and HSOMA [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In Nolle et al (2005), PathLength ¼ 2. In Lin and Juan Wang (2014), PathLength ¼ 2:1. The setting PathLength ¼ 2:5 is mentioned in Bao and Zelinka (2019).…”
Section: Control Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most publications, PathLength ¼ 3. However, we will find ones where it is close to 2, see Lin and Juan Wang (2014), dos Santos Coelho (2009a, 2009b, and Mariani et al (2009). Therefore, in this experiment, values 2 and 3 were taken.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%