2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70031-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Simulation of High-Reynolds Number Flows Relying on a Variational Multiscale Model

Abstract: We are interested in the study and improvement of the LES component in hybrid RANS-LES formulations. These models are not designed for blunt-body flows with laminar boundary layers, but it is interesting to examine how they behave in that case. A DDES model is compared with a dynamic Variational multi-scale (DVMS) LES model for two subcritical flows past a cylinder. We then propose a hybridation restricting to DVMS in LES regions. The performances of the different options are compared for subcritical flows and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reconsider here the two first test cases of [6], with several updates and new computations involving other models. A third test case (see Figure 1), which concerns a high subcritical Reynolds number, is also presented for the assessment of the different turbulence models introduced in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We reconsider here the two first test cases of [6], with several updates and new computations involving other models. A third test case (see Figure 1), which concerns a high subcritical Reynolds number, is also presented for the assessment of the different turbulence models introduced in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lines of [6], DVMS, DDES and our hybrid model are compared for subcritical flows past cylinders. For low and medium subcritical Reynolds numbers (Re = 3900 and Re = 20000), the computations performed with the turbulent models mentioned above compare well with experimental data and numerical results in the litterature.…”
Section: Comments and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation