2013
DOI: 10.1130/ges00793.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid submarine flows comprising turbidity current and cohesive debris flow: Deposits, theoretical and experimental analyses, and generalized models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
161
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(297 reference statements)
8
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modified from Fildani and Normark (2004), Klaucke et al (2004), Xu et al (2004Xu et al ( , 2013 and Paull et al (2005Paull et al ( , 2010aPaull et al ( , 2010b. which is consistent with available field observations (Xu 2011;Talling 2013). The dynamics of supercritical flows is an active field of research, and laboratory experiments reveal that important flow properties are substantially different from subcritical flow, such as the velocity and sediment concentration profiles (Sequeiros 2012;Xu 2011).…”
Section: (B) Supercritical-flow Dynamics and Depositssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modified from Fildani and Normark (2004), Klaucke et al (2004), Xu et al (2004Xu et al ( , 2013 and Paull et al (2005Paull et al ( , 2010aPaull et al ( , 2010b. which is consistent with available field observations (Xu 2011;Talling 2013). The dynamics of supercritical flows is an active field of research, and laboratory experiments reveal that important flow properties are substantially different from subcritical flow, such as the velocity and sediment concentration profiles (Sequeiros 2012;Xu 2011).…”
Section: (B) Supercritical-flow Dynamics and Depositssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Turbulence damping and subsequent collapse, and associated sediment settling into denser nonNewtonian near-bed layers within the flow (Fig. 7A), may explain the widespread occurrence of debris flow deposits in the relatively distal parts of hybrid beds (Ito 2008;Haughton et al 2009;Hodgson 2009;Talling 2013), although these debris flows can themselves sometimes be far travelled on low gradients.…”
Section: (B) Supercritical-flow Dynamics and Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type C beds are interpreted to represent different stages of flow transformation of turbidity currents into hybrid flows, namely flows in the form of a frontal turbidity current and a lagging co-genetic debris flow (Haughton et al, 2003;Haughton et al, 2009;Talling, 2013;Southern et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sed i ment grav ity flows of ten trans form from ei ther dense, sed iment-rich and lam i nar to less dense, wa tery and of ten tur bu lent cur rents or vice versa: from less dense, tur bu lent to densier flows as they slow down (Fe lix and Peakall, 2006;Fe lix et al, 2009;Haughton et al, 2009;Talling et al, 2012;Talling, 2013). This also gov erns the trans for ma tion of sole struc tures de pending on the flow char ac ter im ply ing the pos si bil ity to use these struc tures, i.e.…”
Section: Implication For Interpretations Of Depositional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sand stone to mudstone ra tio is 33:1. Based on all these fea tures, the sed i ments of Unit I are in terpreted as high-den sity turbidites and/or debrites (e.g., Haughton et al, 2009;Hodgson, 2009;Talling et al, 2012;DirnerovĂĄ et al, 2012;Talling, 2013). Sole struc tures are mainly rep re sented by load struc tures (load casts of Boggs, 2001;Collinson et al, 2006; po lyg o nal ridges of Dzulynski and Simpson, 1966) and mi nor grooves.…”
Section: Sediments and Sole Structures Of The Studied Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%