“…For all results, it is possible to observe how the HWDA approach correctly forecasts the unexpected and abrupt changes of the wind power profile, that is, its uncertainty behaviour during the whole day of forecasting. Tables 6 and 7 provide a comparative study between the HWDA approach using MAPE and the daily error variance criterion and five other previously published methodologies, namely NN [29], Tables 6 and 7 provide a comparative study between the HWDA approach using MAPE and the daily error variance criterion and five other previously published methodologies, namely NN [29], Tables 6 and 7 provide a comparative study between the HWDA approach using MAPE and the daily error variance criterion and five other previously published methodologies, namely NN [29], Tables 6 and 7 provide a comparative study between the HWDA approach using MAPE and the daily error variance criterion and five other previously published methodologies, namely NN [29], NF [32], WNF [34], WPA [35], and HEA [45], respectively. When the HWDA approach is used, the MAPE criterion has an average value of 3.37%, representing an enhancement of 11.28% compared to the HEA methodology, which is again significant.…”