2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.12.010
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydra effect and paradox of enrichment in discrete-time predator-prey models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al (2013) suggested that such discrete-time systems with biomass conversion might be more stable because of the ordering of events, assuming that predation occurs before reproduction. However, even though event ordering (reproduction vs survival) can affect stability in these models, census timing may not: Weide et al (2018) show that, for models with explicit biomass conversion, census timing only imply minor quantitative differences in model outputs. For difference equations, major qualitative differences only occur between models that assume biomass conversion to happen before reproduction (more stable) or after (more oscillating), as shown by Weide et al (2018).…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Zhou et al (2013) suggested that such discrete-time systems with biomass conversion might be more stable because of the ordering of events, assuming that predation occurs before reproduction. However, even though event ordering (reproduction vs survival) can affect stability in these models, census timing may not: Weide et al (2018) show that, for models with explicit biomass conversion, census timing only imply minor quantitative differences in model outputs. For difference equations, major qualitative differences only occur between models that assume biomass conversion to happen before reproduction (more stable) or after (more oscillating), as shown by Weide et al (2018).…”
Section: Model Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from changing parameters, one neat way to produce wilder dynamics would be to allow for predation on adults -this can be done phenomenologically rather than mechanistically by simply having an adult prey survival rate that depends on predator (adult) density. Other options are proposed by Zhou et al (2013) and Weide et al (2018). This would allow for predator-prey cycles (we have seen this in explorations of the nonlinear matrix model), but we note that we would need to change the time-frames of simulation considered (e.g., 30 to 100 years) in order to see well these long-period cycles.…”
Section: More Intricate or Challenging Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [28], the author analyzed a discrete predatorprey model with nonmonotonic functional response exhibit and proved the existence of fold bifurcation, transcritical bifurcation, flip bifurcation and Neimark-Sacker bifurcations (NSB). Similarly, some discrete-time predator-prey models and hydra effect and paradox of enrichment are studied in [29]. Furthermore, for several attracting findings associated to the qualitative analysis of difference equations, we refer to the work done by [30], [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В мировой литературе широко представлены исследования динамических систем типа «хищник -жертва» или «паразит -хозяин» [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][22][23][24] модификациями классических моделей Лотки -Вольтерры [1] и Николсона -Бейли [2,3]. В непрерывной по времени модели Лотки -Вольтерры предполагается, что поколения взаимодействующих популяций полностью перекрываются и процессы рождаемости и смертности непрерывны.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified