2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydration-layer models for cryo-EM image simulation

Abstract: To compare cryo-EM images and 3D reconstructions with atomic structures in a quantitative way it is essential to model the electron scattering by solvent (water or ice) that surrounds protein assemblies. The most rigorous method for determing the density of solvating water atoms for this purpose has been to perform molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations of the protein-water system. In this paper we adapt the ideas of bulk-water modeling that are used in the refinement of X-ray crystal structures to the cryo-EM so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight rotations, uniformly spaced in the range ±20 degrees, were applied to the atomic coordinates of the antibody fragment. A density map was created for each volume by using a simulator of solvated protein (Shang 2012). Then the volumes were low pass filtered to simulate limited resolution (voxel size: 2.5 Å cubed).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight rotations, uniformly spaced in the range ±20 degrees, were applied to the atomic coordinates of the antibody fragment. A density map was created for each volume by using a simulator of solvated protein (Shang 2012). Then the volumes were low pass filtered to simulate limited resolution (voxel size: 2.5 Å cubed).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulated cryo-EM images were generated from the atomic structure of the 50S ribosomal subunit from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 1JJ2) using a hydration model [27], and was sampled at a pixel size of 3Å. The 2D particle images (inliers) were obtained from the 3D structure according to the image model in (17) and (18) by: 1) projecting the structure and applying a CTF; 2) applying the amplitude factor from a uniform distribution between 0.5 and1.5; and 3) adding Gaussian white noise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand how the vesicle removal affects the protein signal and how the vesicle removal performs under varying amounts of noise, we first generated simulated protein projections [38] and added Gaussian noise from increasing inverse signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). A realistic amount of noise versus the membrane protein is about ten times in the inverse SNR [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A realistic amount of noise versus the membrane protein is about ten times in the inverse SNR [38]. Then we projected the simulated images, without added vesicles, onto the above trained vesicle subspace and onto its orthogonal complement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%