2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic Characterization of Solenoid-actuated Injectors for Diesel Engine Common Rail Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that the closing delay of the injector is shorter at high injection pressure and when the excitation duration is shorter. The observed trend was similar to that of solenoid-actuated diesel common rail injectors as reported by Ferrari et al [26]. This is because it takes time for the electrical energy from the control unit to overcome the resistance of the injector's closing spring.…”
Section: Hydraulic Delaysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This shows that the closing delay of the injector is shorter at high injection pressure and when the excitation duration is shorter. The observed trend was similar to that of solenoid-actuated diesel common rail injectors as reported by Ferrari et al [26]. This is because it takes time for the electrical energy from the control unit to overcome the resistance of the injector's closing spring.…”
Section: Hydraulic Delaysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In order to better model the upper part of the injection rate regarding the large injection events (ET=1ms), the high-pressure pump and the high pressure line upstream the common rail have to be modelled as well. This solution would require a lot of efforts, so a good approximation that take into account the pressure oscillations generated by the injection system can be the implementation of the pressure time evolution instead of the constant pressure value [41]. On the other hand, the main purpose of the work is to provide independence from the experimental conditions from which the model has been validated, enabling it to work in a wider range of inlet conditions.…”
Section: Variable Inlet Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This solution would require a lot of efforts, so a good approximation that takes into account the pressure oscillations generated by the injection system can be the implementation of the pressure–time evolution instead of the constant pressure value. 41 Figure 12(a) shows a typical pressure–time evolution during the single-injection event. Hence, a better fit in the stationary part of the injection rate, compared with the first approach curve, can be obtained without losing accuracy in the opening and closing phases as expected (Figure 12(b)).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent technologies have been developed to reduce fuel consumption and include engine downsizing [1], alternative fuels [2], innovative combustion concepts [3,4], advanced high-pressure injection systems [5][6][7][8][9][10], model-based control [11][12][13][14][15], advanced aftertreatment systems [16], kinetic and thermal energy recovery [17], vehicle lightweight [18], electrification of the powertrain [19], and vehicle connectivity [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%