2012
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic subsurface measurements and hydrodynamic modelling as indicators for groundwater flow systems in the Rotondo granite, Central Alps (Switzerland)

Abstract: Abstract:Regional groundwater flow in high mountainous terrain is governed by a multitude of factors such as geology, topography, recharge conditions, structural elements such as fracturation and regional fault zones as well as man-made underground structures. By means of a numerical groundwater flow model, we consider the impact of deep underground tunnels and of an idealized major fault zone on the groundwater flow systems within the fractured Rotondo granite. The position of the free groundwater table as re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated groundwater table (Figure 2b) remains close to the ground surface in valley bottoms and near streams, but is located as deep as 176 m below the ground surface in highland and steep areas (similar spatial trends to Ofterdinger et al, 2014), well below the 20-m-thick unconsolidated surficial aquifer. Therefore, much of the modeled groundwater flow toward the streams passes through the bedrock aquifer, as suggested in other mountain hydrological studies (Andermann et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2004;Tague et al, 2008).…”
Section: Glacier Melt Contributes Little To Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The simulated groundwater table (Figure 2b) remains close to the ground surface in valley bottoms and near streams, but is located as deep as 176 m below the ground surface in highland and steep areas (similar spatial trends to Ofterdinger et al, 2014), well below the 20-m-thick unconsolidated surficial aquifer. Therefore, much of the modeled groundwater flow toward the streams passes through the bedrock aquifer, as suggested in other mountain hydrological studies (Andermann et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2004;Tague et al, 2008).…”
Section: Glacier Melt Contributes Little To Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 76%
“…This work showed the benefits of correctly modeling the effect of epikarst on recharge. Authors like Ofterdinger et al [45] use a complex hydrological model that computes the recharge contribution and the runoff of precipitation on the base of several parameters, like the slope, the altitude and the soil cover. They obtain satisfactory results.…”
Section: Recharge and Epikarst Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on observed spring line elevations and alpine stream hydrograph records in the study and neighboring areas (Gerental, Rotondo area) Loew and Herfort [38], Büsser [36] and Ofterdinger et al [39] assessed spatial distributions of deep groundwater recharge rates into the fractured bedrock. The spatial average bedrock recharge rate in the Gotthard massif is about 1.4E À 8 m/s, which is in agreement with studies in similar topographic and geological settings in the Central Alps [40].…”
Section: Surface Hydrology and Groundwater Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%