2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-015-1283-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydro-economic analysis of groundwater pumping for irrigated agriculture in California’s Central Valley, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing body of studies that use IWFM for groundwater resources analysis, management, and planning under complex requirements [27,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. In this section, some of these studies carried out by C2VSim that highlight the features IWFM that are instrumental in effective groundwater resources analysis and management are described.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of studies that use IWFM for groundwater resources analysis, management, and planning under complex requirements [27,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. In this section, some of these studies carried out by C2VSim that highlight the features IWFM that are instrumental in effective groundwater resources analysis and management are described.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions to irrigated land areas are one mechanism that would expectedly reduce groundwater demands (Massoud et al, ). Hydroeconomic models suggest that lands growing less‐profitable crops may be more likely to be fallowed during droughts, although decisions to fallow are complex and incorporate considerations beyond water availability (e.g., price expectations) (Medellín‐Azuara et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we suggest that targeting groundwater management to producers whose well yields are most sensitive to further depletion is likely to result in greater welfare benefits than policies that are applied uniformly. Existing hydro‐economic models of groundwater management [e.g., Brozović et al ., ; Bulatewicz et al ., ; Athanassoglou et al ., ; Peterson and Saak , ; Steward et al ., ; Medellín‐Azuara et al ., ] do not capture adequately these important feedbacks between aquifer depletion, well yields, and agricultural productivity. We suggest that such models therefore will be unable to provide reliable insights about the distributional impacts of depletion, or about how policies to control groundwater use should be implemented spatially and temporally to maximize welfare benefits from limited groundwater resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%