2002
DOI: 10.1109/66.983442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic characteristics of the thin fluid film in chemical-mechanical polishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-dimensional and two-dimensional pressure profiles were obtained, and the results suggested that a large negative pressure region, which occupied more than 70% of the contact area between the disk and the pad, existed near the leading edge of the disk. Above experimental results were basically accordant with the calculation results of Sundararajan et al, 9 Park et al, 10 Cho et al, 11 Chen and Fang, 12 Kim et al, 13 and Tsai et al, 14,15 which were based on the hydrodynamic lubrication theory and the simplified CMP model.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…One-dimensional and two-dimensional pressure profiles were obtained, and the results suggested that a large negative pressure region, which occupied more than 70% of the contact area between the disk and the pad, existed near the leading edge of the disk. Above experimental results were basically accordant with the calculation results of Sundararajan et al, 9 Park et al, 10 Cho et al, 11 Chen and Fang, 12 Kim et al, 13 and Tsai et al, 14,15 which were based on the hydrodynamic lubrication theory and the simplified CMP model.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations and mass transport equations for the reactants were solved using finite element techniques. Other wafer scale purely hydrodynamic models of CMP include the work of Park et al [53], Cho et al [54], and Chen et al [55].…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this information, the film thicknesses h m , wafer tilts α, and pressure distributions for each wafer were calculated using the hydrodynamic model of Chen and Fang. 13 The film thicknesses obtained range from 28 μm to 56 μm, with wafer tilt angles of 0.0017 • to 0.0082 • . Generally, higher applied pressures and smaller dome heights resulted in thinner films and smaller angles of tilt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%