2018
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic interactions between aerosol particles in the transition regime

Abstract: We present a method for calculating the hydrodynamic interactions between particles in the kinetic (or transition regime), characterized by non-negligible particle Knudsen numbers. Such particles are often present in aerosol systems. The method is based on our extended Kirkwood–Riseman theory (Corson et al., Phys. Rev. E, vol. 95 (1), 2017c, 013103), which accounts for interactions between spheres using the velocity field around a translating sphere as a function of Knudsen number. Results for the two-sphere p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, the mobility ratio is constant with increasing N near the continuum regime and decreases with N in the free molecule regime. At intermediate Knudsen numbers, the aligned versus random behavior becomes more continuum-like at large N; this is analogous to the behavior we have observed for the translational friction coefficient of soot-like aggregates (Corson et al 2017b). We will explain this behavior in Section 4.…”
Section: Effects Of Aggregate Size and Field Strength On Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally speaking, the mobility ratio is constant with increasing N near the continuum regime and decreases with N in the free molecule regime. At intermediate Knudsen numbers, the aligned versus random behavior becomes more continuum-like at large N; this is analogous to the behavior we have observed for the translational friction coefficient of soot-like aggregates (Corson et al 2017b). We will explain this behavior in Section 4.…”
Section: Effects Of Aggregate Size and Field Strength On Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We also show that the ratio of fully aligned to random mobility is a function of the number of primary spheres and the primary sphere size. Near the continuum regime, the mobility ratio is approximately constant with N, and near the free molecule regime, the mobility ratio decreases with N. We discuss this topic in some detail in the SI, but the brief explanation is as follows: the mobility of an aggregate in the continuum and free molecule regimes is roughly inversely proportional to the radius of gyration (Meakin et al 1985;Sorensen 2011;Corson et al 2017b) and the orientation-averaged projected area (Zhang et al 2012), respectively. Similarly, the continuum and free molecule aligned mobilities are correlated to the inverses of the radius of gyration about the major axis of the polarizability tensor (i.e., the z 0 -axis), R gz 0 , and the projected area in the plane normal to the z 0 -axis, PA z 0 (see the SI)s Averaged over 20 cases, the ratio R g =R gz 0 is approximately constant (after accounting for the statistical fluctuations described above) with N, while PA=PA z 0 decreases with N, mirroring the trends in the mobility ratios in the continuum and free molecule limits.…”
Section: General Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For sufficiently large N aggregates (e.g., N >> 300), we exploited effective porous medium methods (Tandon and Rosner 1995;Rosner andTandon 2017, 2018), using adjusted sphere model (ASM) to embrace the Knudsen transition regime. Efficient computational methods for smaller aggregates, of interest in many applications and to validate ASM, have been recently been developed and illustrated by Corson et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermophoretical effects can eventually accelerate the particle motion relative to the gas in the cooling region in front of the orifice (Saggese et al., 2016). In and behind the orifice, the nanoparticle trajectories can be expected to follow the gas flow and, particle–flow interactions are negligible due to the very small volume fraction (Corson, Mulholland, & Zachariah, 2018; Friedlander, 2000). Hence, as first approximation, two-phase flow modelling is not really mandatory to capture the important flow properties and processes in the dilution tube.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%