2006
DOI: 10.2112/04-0214.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics and Sediment Fluxes across an Onshore Migrating Intertidal Bar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This case developed a small major bar but also a few minor bars or large ripples either side of the bar. Compared to case S1, the bars tended to move onshore due to the low-energy conditions, consistent with Aagaard et al (2006). Initially, the conditions promoted strong onshore sediment transport outside the breakpoint.…”
Section: Profile Response To Monochromatic Wavessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This case developed a small major bar but also a few minor bars or large ripples either side of the bar. Compared to case S1, the bars tended to move onshore due to the low-energy conditions, consistent with Aagaard et al (2006). Initially, the conditions promoted strong onshore sediment transport outside the breakpoint.…”
Section: Profile Response To Monochromatic Wavessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It is generally accepted that mean offshore-directed flows are responsible for beach erosion and offshore bar migration under energetic wave conditions, but there is considerable debate in the literature as to what causes beach accretion and onshore bar migration under calm wave conditions. There have been a number of processes proposed that may be implicated in onshore sediment transport, berm construction and bar migration, including: (1) onshore mass flux due to cell circulation (Aagaard et al, 2006); (2) sediment stratification (Conley et al, 2008); (3) turbulence associated with breaking waves and bores (Butt et al, 2004); (4) cross-shore velocity skewness ('wave skewness'; Marino-Tapia et al, 2007); (5) cross-shore velocity acceleration skewness ('wave asymmetry'; Hoefel and Elgar, 2003); (6) ventilated boundary layer (Conley and Inman, 1992); and (7) plug flow due to horizontal pressure gradients (Foster et al, 2006). These different processes are not necessarily mutually exclusive and all, except (1), are addressed during BARDEX II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few examples of when energetics models have been able to successfully predict onshore transport have been when three-dimensional circulation has existed (e.g. Aagaard et al, 1998Aagaard et al, , 2006, whereby the mass flux of the waves is returned seawards through long-shore feeder and rip channels rather than through the bed return flow (e.g. Masselink et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%