2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41115-020-0008-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics of core-collapse supernovae and their progenitors

Abstract: Multi-dimensional fluid flow plays a paramount role in the explosions of massive stars as core-collapse supernovae. In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) simulations of these phenomena have matured significantly. Considerable progress has been made towards identifying the ingredients for shock revival by the neutrino-driven mechanism, and successful explosions have already been obtained in a number of selfconsistent 3D models. These advances also bring new challenges, however. Prompted by a need for increase… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 480 publications
(906 reference statements)
2
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade significant progress has been made in the development of numerical codes, in particular in the treatment of multidimensional effects [12]. In the case of neutrino-driven explosions, the GW emission is primarly induced by instabilities developed at the newly formed proto-neutron star (PNS) and by the non-spherical accreting flow of hot matter over its surface [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade significant progress has been made in the development of numerical codes, in particular in the treatment of multidimensional effects [12]. In the case of neutrino-driven explosions, the GW emission is primarly induced by instabilities developed at the newly formed proto-neutron star (PNS) and by the non-spherical accreting flow of hot matter over its surface [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtain parameters 3 of ln A C19 = −2.98 ± 0.13 and n C19 = 0.74 ± 0.04. In contrast, Meakin & Arnett (2007) report ln A M07 = 0.062 ± 0.87 and n M07 = 1.05 ± 0.21 and also the results of Jones et al (2017) and Andrassy et al (2020) agree with an exponent of n ≈ 1, as pointed out by Müller (2020). Further simulations are needed to scrutinize the values of A and n, also keeping in mind that different values may exist for different stellar convection zones.…”
Section: Convective Boundary Mixingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Conversely, literature values for A vary from A ≈ 1 (Meakin & Arnett 2007) to A ≈ 0.05 (Cristini et al 2019). See Müller (2020) and references therein for examples of entrainment law parameters derived from 3D simulation results. The fact that A and n are not the same between setups suggests that the entrainment law in its current form does not encompass every aspect of the growth of the convective region in these simulations.…”
Section: Dependence Of Entrainment On the Entrainment Law Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 in Brott et al 2011) and asteroseismic frequencies (Aerts et al 2018). E-mail: l.j.a.scott@keele.ac.uk Both 3D hydrodynamics simulations and observations can be compared to 1D models incorporating CBM and other mixing processes, such as waves (Meakin & Arnett 2007;Jones et al 2017;Edelmann et al 2019;Müller 2020;Pratt et al 2020). Incorporating 3D hydrodynamics results, such as convective regions that grow as a result of entrainment, into 1D models also allows them to be studied on evolutionary time-scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%