Ionic Liquids - New Aspects for the Future 2013
DOI: 10.5772/51658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics of Ionic Liquids in Bubble Columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between the voltage output and the liquid hold up is usually nonlinear and requires an off-line calibration. The voltage output from each conductance probe at each measurement point was normalized using the maximum voltage output of each probe when the pipe is fully filled with water (slug body section) to produce a dimensionless value in the same way as the conductance probe was calibrated off-line to account for temperature variations during the experiments [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the voltage output and the liquid hold up is usually nonlinear and requires an off-line calibration. The voltage output from each conductance probe at each measurement point was normalized using the maximum voltage output of each probe when the pipe is fully filled with water (slug body section) to produce a dimensionless value in the same way as the conductance probe was calibrated off-line to account for temperature variations during the experiments [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior was interpreted by Besagni and co-authors using the "dual effect of viscosity over the flow regime transition" [11] concept: (a) "moderate/high viscosities" stabilize the homogeneous flow regime, owing to increased coalescence [3,11,56] and the presence of cap-bubbles [11] (as experimentally observed by Wikinson et al [56] and more recently, by Yang et al [57]); (b) "low viscosities" stabilize the homogeneous flow regime, as the reduced coalescence increases the number of small bubbles; For example, Besagni et al [11] (Figure 9a,b) found that µ L , depending on its value, either stabilizes or destabilizes the homogeneous flow regime compared to air-water systems (The Mono-Ethylene Glycol, MEG, concentration, c MEG = 0%: U G,trans = 0.0264 m/s, ε G,trans = 0.09; c MEG = 5%: U G,trans = 0.039 m/s, ε G,trans = 0.18; c MEG = 80%: U G,trans = 0.023 m/s, ε G,trans = 0.07). It is worth noting that the increased coalescence may also suppress the homogeneous flow regime and, for µ L > 8 mPa·s, it may not exist even with a 'fine gas sparger' [8,[58][59][60].…”
Section: Influence Of the Liquid Phase Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, high viscous media are characterized by more stable interfaces and thus, promote the formation of large bubbles at the gas sparger [3,259], bubble coalescence [3,56,58,59] and decreases in the bubble breakup rate [24,56]. Viscous liquid phases also change the nucleation process [260] as the bubble detachment in viscous liquid phase ins mainly determined by the viscous forces, rather than the inertial and surface tension forces [261].…”
Section: Influence Of the Liquid Properties Viscous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a highly viscous liquid, the bubble surface is more stable, larger bubbles form at the injector, 31,32 and the coalescence rate is larger than the breakage rate. 2,[33][34][35] The study of bubble size distribution shows that in viscous liquids the probability density function (PDF) of the BSD exhibits a bimodal shape. 15,21,36,37 In the bubble column literature, scaling of the characteristic bubble length has been broadly approached assuming the sizing is dominated by either a breakage mechanism 38 or bubble formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%